Lifetime gifts can reduce Inheritance Tax, but survival for seven years and using key exemptions like the £3,000 annual allowance are crucial to making them fully tax-free.

Most gifts made during a person’s lifetime are not immediately subject to Inheritance Tax (IHT). These are known as potentially exempt transfers (PETs) and can become completely exempt from IHT if the person making the gift (the donor) survives for more than seven years after making the gift.

If the donor dies within three years of making the gift, it is treated as if the gift was made on the date of death, and the full rate of IHT may apply. However, if death occurs between three and seven years after the gift, taper relief can reduce the amount of tax payable. The further away from death the gift was made, the lower the tax rate applied, although this only reduces the tax due on the amount above the nil rate band.

It’s important to note that taper relief does not reduce the value of the gift itself, only the tax payable, and it does not apply where the gift is within the nil rate band. Additionally, it does not lower the tax on chargeable lifetime transfers to below the amount originally assessed when the gift was made.

Each tax year, individuals can also take advantage of specific IHT exemptions that allow gifts to be made tax-free, regardless of survival for seven years.

The annual exemption allows you to gift up to £3,000 in total each tax year without adding to the value of your estate for IHT purposes. This amount can be given to one person or shared among multiple recipients. If the full £3,000 exemption isn’t used in one tax year, it can be carried forward, but only for one additional tax year.

The small gift allowance allows you to give as many gifts of up to £250 per person per tax year as you like, as long as no other exemption is used for the same individual. This is ideal for birthday or seasonal gifts made from regular income.

Additionally, you can make tax-free gifts in celebration of weddings or civil partnerships. These are exempt up to £5,000 for a child, £2,500 for a grandchild or great-grandchild and £1,000 for anyone else.

The Court of Appeal addressed the complexities of benefit scheme amendments and the lines of responsibility within corporate structures in a complex case surrounding post-employment entitlements. A Mr. Fasano had been an employee of RB Health Ltd., a member of the Reckitt Benckiser (RB) Group of companies, until the 13th of June 2019. The RB Group operates a long-term incentive plan, or LTIP, which makes provision of shares or share options for senior personnel employed by its various companies. 

On the 18th of September 2019, RB Group amended the terms of the 2015 LTIP, requiring those participating in the 2015 LTIP to be employed as of 18 September 2019 to benefit from amended performance conditions in May 2020. Thus, Mr. Fasano was not eligible for an award under the amended LTIP rules. Mr. Fasano brought his case against RB Health and the RB Group to a tribunal, alleging that he had been subjected to indirect discrimination on the grounds of age, contrary to Sections 19 and 39 of the Equality Act 2010. 

However, the tribunal held that RB Group was acting as the agent of RB Health when it amended the terms of the rules of the 2015 LTIP and that the provision, criterion or practice (PCP) thus pursued a legitimate aim. On appeal, it was found that the PCP applied by RB Group was incapable of achieving any legitimate aim of retaining staff and thus was not justified. However, the appeal was ultimately dismissed as the RB Group was not acting as the agent of RB Health, and neither RB Health nor RB Group was liable by reason of Sections 109 and 110 of the Act. 

The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal and agreed with the appeals tribunal that RB Group was not acting as an agent for RB Health when it amended the performance conditions of the LTIP. Therefore, RB Health is not, therefore, liable for any change made by RB Group to the LTIP pursuant to Section 109 of the Act. The Judge emphasised that, for agency to exist under common law and therefore within the scope of the Act, there needs to be clear authorisation from the principal (RB Health) for the agent (RB Group) to act on its behalf as regards a third party, such as Mr. Fasano. The fact that RB Health's employees benefited from the LTIP didn't automatically make RB Group its agent, although there might have been a different outcome if the rules had been applied by an employer to current employees.  

This case demonstrates that, if a parent company, rather than the direct employer, makes a discriminatory decision regarding benefits, it might be harder to hold the direct employer liable under agency principles. Nonetheless, employers need to ensure that any performance-related policies are justifiable in their aim and implementation and non-discriminatory. 

For high net worth individuals (HNWIs), tax planning is not simply a compliance activity, it is a strategic tool to preserve and grow wealth. With rising scrutiny from HMRC, frozen allowances, and increasingly complex legislation, the value of well-structured planning has never been higher.

HNWIs typically have multiple sources of income: from employment, dividends, property, pensions, or overseas investments. This complexity brings opportunities, but also risk. Without active tax planning, much of that income can be lost to inefficient structuring or missed reliefs.

Using allowances such as the personal allowance, dividend allowance, and savings allowance is key. Where income exceeds £100,000, tapering of allowances becomes relevant. Income splitting between spouses and the use of family investment companies or trusts can help manage liabilities.

The capital gains tax (CGT) annual exemption is now only £3,000 (2025–26). Disposals must be timed carefully, with use of spousal exemptions or crystallising gains across tax years considered.

HNWIs are most exposed to inheritance tax (IHT), which charges 40% on estates above £325,000 (plus any residence nil-rate band). Making lifetime gifts, using trusts, and taking advantage of the exemption for gifts from surplus income can significantly reduce exposure.

Global families must manage UK tax residency and domicile status carefully. The remittance basis may apply to foreign income, but this often requires payment of the remittance basis charge. Changes to domicile treatment post-April 2025 make planning in this area even more important.

Pensions, ISAs, and offshore bonds can provide valuable tax sheltering. For HNWIs, using the annual and lifetime pension allowances efficiently, especially while they remain available, is a core planning task.

In summary, proactive tax planning is about more than saving money. It gives HNWIs confidence, control, and the ability to plan for the future. With HMRC increasing its focus on high earners, reviewing tax affairs annually is no longer optional, it makes good financial sense.

Gross profit margin
This measures the profitability of your core operations by comparing gross profit (sales minus cost of goods sold) to total revenue. A stable or improving gross margin indicates pricing, production, or service delivery is efficient. A declining margin may signal rising costs or pricing issues.

Formula: (Gross Profit ÷ Revenue) × 100

Cash flow
Positive cash flow ensures a business can meet its obligations, pay suppliers and staff, and invest in growth. Even profitable businesses fail without adequate cash. Tracking cash flow (operating, investing, and financing activities) helps prevent liquidity crises.

Monitor: Monthly net cash inflow/outflow and rolling 3-month cash forecast

Customer acquisition cost (CAC)
This shows how much it costs to acquire a new customer. If CAC is rising without a corresponding increase in customer value or retention, it can drain profitability. Ideally, CAC should be lower than the revenue generated by each customer over their lifetime.

Formula: Total Sales and Marketing Costs ÷ Number of New Customers

Net profit margin
This is the bottom line—what remains after all costs, taxes, and interest. It reflects overall efficiency and financial viability. A strong net margin gives room for reinvestment and debt servicing, and signals long-term sustainability.

Formula: (Net Profit ÷ Revenue) × 100

1 July 2025 – Due date for corporation tax due for the year ended 30 September 2024.

6 July 2025 – Complete and submit forms P11D return of benefits and expenses and P11D(b) return of Class 1A NICs.

19 July 2025 – Pay Class 1A NICs (by the 22 July 2025 if paid electronically).

19 July 2025 – PAYE and NIC deductions due for month ended 5 July 2025. (If you pay your tax electronically the due date is 22 July 2025).

19 July 2025 – Filing deadline for the CIS300 monthly return for the month ended 5 July 2025. 

19 July 2025 – CIS tax deducted for the month ended 5 July 2025 is payable by today.

1 August 2025 – Due date for corporation tax due for the year ended 31 October 2024.

19 August 2025 – PAYE and NIC deductions due for month ended 5 August 2025. (If you pay your tax electronically the due date is 22 August 2025)

19 August 2025 – Filing deadline for the CIS300 monthly return for the month ended 5 August 2025. 

19 August 2025 – CIS tax deducted for the month ended 5 August 2025 is payable by today.