Skip to main content

Rules to protect effects of debanking

Banks must now give 90 days’ notice before closing accounts, giving customers more time to respond.

Since April 2026, new government rules strengthen protections for individuals and small businesses at risk of unfair bank account closures. Under the legislation, banks and payment service providers are required to give at least 90 days’ written notice before closing an account or terminating a payment service, commonly known as debanking. A significant increase from the previous 2-month limit.

Banks are also required to provide a clear explanation for the closure, allowing customers to challenge the decision including through the Financial Ombudsman Service. These changes are designed to protect customers, particularly small businesses, who have often found their accounts shut down without notice or reason, leaving them unable to operate or seek alternatives.

The new rules form part of the government’s wider Plan for Change, aimed at delivering economic security and supporting growth. The rules came into force for relevant new contracts agreed from 28 April 2026 onwards and also apply to the termination of basic personal bank accounts.

There are exceptions in cases where closure is necessary to comply with financial crime laws. Existing protections which prohibit a bank from discriminating against a UK consumer based on political opinions or beliefs remain in place.

Trusts and Income Tax

Trustees must manage assets, follow tax rules, and register with HMRC where required.

A trust is a legal arrangement in which a trustee, either an individual or a company, is entrusted with managing assets such as land, money, or shares on behalf of others. These assets, placed into the trust by a settlor, are managed for the benefit of one or more beneficiaries.

Trustees are responsible for deciding how the trust's assets are to be managed, distributed, or retained for future use. They are also accountable for reporting and paying any tax due on behalf of the trust. If the trust pays or owes tax, it must be registered with HMRC.

Income received by a trust is subject to varying rates of Income Tax, depending on the type of trust.

Discretionary (or accumulation) trusts: Trustees pay tax on the trust's income. The first £500 is taxed at the standard rate. Income above this threshold is taxed at:

  • 39.35% for dividend income
  • 45% for all other types of income

Interest in possession trusts: Trustees are similarly responsible for paying tax on income. The rates are:

  • 8.75% for dividend income
  • 20% for all other income

There are additional trust structures, for example, bare trusts and settlor-interested trusts, which are subject to different rules and tax treatments. As a result, it is essential to consider both Income Tax and Capital Gains Tax (CGT) implications from the outset when establishing or managing any type of trust.

VAT – digital record keeping

HMRC requires businesses to maintain accurate VAT records to ensure correct tax payments. While all businesses must retain general records (such as invoices, bank statements, and receipts), a key requirement under the Making Tax Digital for VAT initiative is keeping specific VAT records digitally.

Businesses must maintain digital records of VAT charged and paid, including:

  • The VAT on all goods and services that are sold (supplies made) and purchased (supplies received).
  • The time and value of each supply (excluding VAT).
  • Any adjustments made to VAT returns.
  • Reverse charge transactions.
  • VAT accounting schemes used.
  • Daily gross takings when using a retail scheme.
  • Items where VAT has been reclaimed for Flat Rate Scheme users.
  • Total sales and VAT on those sales for those trading in gold and using the Gold Accounting Scheme.

Digital records must be kept using compatible software or spreadsheets that can connect directly with HMRC systems. Where multiple software tools are used, they must be linked digitally, manual transfer of data or ‘copy and paste’ is not allowed. Digital links can include formulas in spreadsheets, imports/exports of XML or CSV files, or uploading/downloading data.

Businesses must start keeping records from the moment they register for VAT and retain them for at least 6 years (10 years if using certain VAT schemes). Exemptions apply only to specific entities, like government departments or those eligible for an exemption from keeping digital records.

Definition of a building sub-contractor

Know the rules for contractors & subs under CIS to avoid issues with HMRC.

Under the Construction Industry Scheme (CIS), HMRC applies specific tax rules to contractors and subcontractors in the construction industry. Contractors are responsible for deducting tax from payments made to subcontractors and forwarding it to HMRC. These deductions act as advance payments toward the subcontractor’s income tax and National Insurance.

A subcontractor is defined as any business or individual that agrees to perform construction operations for another business (a contractor or deemed contractor). This applies whether the work is done directly or through others such as employees or further subcontractors. Notably, a business typically considered a main contractor can be a subcontractor if hired by another contractor, such as a local authority.

Subcontractors can include:

  • Companies, public bodies, partnerships and self-employed individuals.
  • Labour agencies or staff bureaus that supply or employ workers for construction.
  • Foreign businesses performing construction in the UK or its territorial waters.
  • Local authorities or public bodies engaged in construction work for others.
  • Gang-leaders who agrees with a contractor on the work to be done, and in turn receives payment for the work of the team.

Some businesses function as both contractors and subcontractors, paying others while also being paid for their services. These businesses must follow both sets of CIS rules depending on their role in each transaction.

A magical clause does not necessarily nullify employment status

A recent ruling has provided a timely reminder that substance trumps form in employment status disputes, and the mere insertion of a clause does not automatically change the employment status of workers. This case concerns an appeal by BCAL, a company that provides vehicle collection, inspection, delivery, and transportation services. The core dispute revolves around the employment status of hundreds of individuals who work as drivers for BCAL.

The standard-form contract contained a term that permitted the drivers to make use of a substitute. However, a central issue in this case was whether the substitution clause was indeed "genuine". 

BCAL instructs drivers via an app, and they generally have no choice over job location, number, or type, although they can decline jobs. However, the Tribunal found evidence of a practice of punishing drivers for refusing work on available days. BCAL sets the fees for each job, with no power of negotiation available to drivers, and drivers are obligated to pay weekly administration and insurance contributions. BCAL pays for and issues DVLA trade plates to drivers, which are essential for driving unregistered/untaxed vehicles for business, and the drivers cannot obtain these themselves. Drivers are provided with branded items in the form of a badge, a hi-vis vest, a phone with an app, a fuel card, inspection equipment, and PPE. Newly recruited drivers must undertake a mandatory four-day in-person training course and receive a detailed training manual, which is regularly updated.

The Tribunals both found that the substitution clause in BCAL's contracts was not "genuine". This case strongly reiterates that the written terms of a contract, particularly a substitution clause, are not conclusive when determining employment status, as tribunals will rigorously examine the true intentions of the parties and the reality of the working relationship. If a contractual right, such as substitution, is not genuinely intended to be exercised or is an "unrealistic possibility" in practice, it will be disregarded.

Companies cannot simply insert a substitution clause into their contracts and assume this guarantees self-employed status. Instead, the right to substitute must be genuine, practicable, and exercised. This ruling carries profound importance for companies that employ people remotely via apps, as merely inserting a clause to infer that such employment is truly flexible can be overturned if it isn’t exercised.