Big changes are here for the self-employed! From 2024-25, profits must align with the tax year, replacing the old "current year basis." Overlap relief is ending, and transition profits will be spread over five years. Here’s how the new system affects your tax bill.

The reform to the self-employed tax basis period has introduced significant changes in how trading income is allocated to tax years. Previously, the tax basis period operated on a "current year basis," but the reform has now shifted to a "tax year basis." As a result, all sole traders and partnership businesses are required to report their profits based on the tax year, commencing with the self-assessment return that was due by 31 January 2025. This return covered the tax year 2023-24.

Under the previous system, overlapping basis periods could occur, which resulted in certain profits being taxed twice. To counter this, businesses could claim ‘overlap relief,’ typically at the time of business cessation. The introduction of the "tax year basis" eliminates the possibility of overlapping basis periods, thereby preventing the generation of further overlap relief.

It is important to note that businesses which already prepare annual accounts to a date between 31 March and 5 April are not affected by these changes. These businesses continue to file their tax returns as they did under the old system, without any alteration.

The full implementation of the new rules takes effect in the current 2024-25 tax year, which ends on 5 April 2025. The 2023-24 tax year is considered a "transition year." During this transitional period, the basis periods for all businesses will be aligned with the tax year, and any outstanding overlap relief can be utilised against profits for that period.

In cases where profits exceed the period covered by the overlap relief—specifically profits that span more than 12 months—these are referred to as "transition profit." This transition profit will, by default, be spread across five tax years, from 2023-24 to 2027-28, to help ensure a smooth adjustment to the new rules.

If you are moving goods across borders, an EORI number may be essential for customs clearance. Whether trading with the EU, Northern Ireland, or beyond, knowing which type you need—GB, XI, or EU—can save time and hassle. Here’s what you need to know.

The EORI number is required for the following situations:

• Moving goods between Great Britain (England, Scotland, and Wales) or the Isle of Man and any other country, including EU member states.
• Moving goods between Great Britain and Northern Ireland.
• Moving goods between Great Britain and the Channel Islands.
• Moving goods between Northern Ireland and countries outside the EU.

The type of EORI number required and where to obtain it depends on the origin and destination of the goods. If you are moving goods to or from Great Britain, you need an EORI number that starts with GB, followed by a 12-digit number based on the business's VAT number.

For movements involving Northern Ireland, you need an EORI number that starts with XI. If you are making declarations or receiving customs decisions within the EU, you may need an EU EORI number from an EU country.

An EORI number is not necessary where both of the following apply:

• The goods being moved are not controlled.
• The goods are for personal use only.

Economic operators (EOs) that are not established in the UK (for a GB EORI) or in Northern Ireland (for an XI EORI) may still be able to register for an EORI number under certain conditions.

Understanding when and which type of EORI number is required is important in order to comply with necessary customs regulations when moving goods internationally.

In a significant move to enhance trust in online reviews, Google has agreed to implement substantial changes to combat fake reviews, following an investigation by the UK's Competition and Markets Authority (CMA). This initiative aims to ensure consumers can rely on genuine feedback when making purchasing decisions.

Background

The CMA launched an investigation into Google over concerns that it wasn't doing enough to detect and remove fake reviews, address suspicious behaviours, or properly sanction those involved in fraudulent review activities. Given that online reviews can significantly influence consumer spending—with estimates suggesting that up to £23 billion of UK consumer spending is potentially swayed by online reviews annually—ensuring their authenticity is crucial.

Google's Commitments

In response to the CMA's concerns, Google has committed to several key actions:

• Enhanced Detection and Removal: Google will implement rigorous steps to identify and eliminate fake reviews swiftly.
• Sanctions for Offenders:
  • Reviewers: Individuals who repeatedly post fake or misleading reviews about UK businesses will have their reviews deleted and will be banned from posting new ones, regardless of their location.
  • Businesses: Companies found to be artificially boosting their star ratings through fake reviews will have prominent 'warning' alerts added to their Google profiles. Additionally, their review function may be deactivated, preventing new reviews. Repeat offenders could see all their reviews from the past six months or more deleted.
• User Reporting: Google will establish a robust reporting system, allowing consumers to easily flag concerning reviews, including those where incentives were offered in exchange for positive feedback.

To ensure compliance, Google will report to the CMA over a three-year period. This move is part of a broader effort to promote fair practices online and protect consumers from misleading information.

The UK government offers a robust safety net for savers through the Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS). This scheme is designed to protect individuals, small businesses, and charities if a bank, building society, or credit union fails, ensuring greater financial security and peace of mind.

How the Scheme Works

The FSCS guarantees deposits of up to £85,000 per person, per authorised institution. For joint accounts, the protection doubles to £170,000, as each account holder is covered individually. This means that if your bank or financial institution collapses, you will not lose your money up to this limit.

Temporary High Balances

In certain situations, the FSCS provides additional cover for temporary high balances, such as when you’ve recently sold a house, received an inheritance, or a large insurance payout. These balances are protected up to £1 million for six months, offering reassurance during significant life events.

Eligibility and Scope

The FSCS covers accounts held in UK-authorised institutions, including current accounts, savings accounts, ISAs, and certain fixed-term deposits. However, it’s essential to check that the Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) regulates your bank. Many banks operate under the same authorisation, so splitting funds between accounts at institutions under one licence won’t increase your protection.

Beyond Deposits

While the FSCS is best known for protecting deposits, it also covers investments, insurance, and pensions under specific terms. However, these protections are subject to separate limits and conditions.

Why It Matters

The FSCS strengthens trust in the UK’s financial system, ensuring that consumers feel confident about saving and investing. For more detailed information, you can visit the FSCS website or check your bank’s coverage status directly.

The scheme stands as a cornerstone of financial stability, giving UK savers valuable protection in uncertain times.

The Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) upheld claims of constructive dismissal and disability discrimination against Whyte & Mackay Limited (W&ML) in the case of Mr. Duployen , a former forklift truck and warehouse operator, following his termination.   

W&ML had appealed the ET's decision on several grounds, seeking reinstatement or re-engagement, a higher award for injury to feelings, and any interest due on the awards. However, reinstatement proved impracticable due to the breakdown in relations and, while theoretically possible, it was not reasonable given the circumstances. Although the issue of re-engagement, while not addressed by the ET, is a required step per Sections 113 and 116 of the Employment Rights Act (ERA) 1996, tribunals are not compelled to order either a reinstatement or re-engagement, even though they have the discretion to do so.

The tribunals found that the appellant suffered embarrassment, humiliation and distress as a consequence of the discriminatory treatment by the respondent with a detrimental impact on his mental health.  

This is a cautionary tale for employers and HR departments alike, and the letter of the law should be followed diligently in terms of the Employment Rights Act (ERA) 1996, the ECHR, and the Human Rights Act (HRA) 1998 to avoid claims of discrimination or constructive dismissal, especially given that not all handicaps or disabilities are self-evident.