Capital Gains Tax on certain residential property sales must be reported and paid within 60 days to avoid penalties and interest.

The annual exempt amount applicable to Capital Gains Tax (CGT) is currently £3,000. CGT is normally charged at a simple flat rate of 24% and this applies to most chargeable gains made by individuals. If taxpayers only pay basic rate tax and make a small capital gain, they may only be subject to a reduced rate of 18%. Once the total of taxable income and gains exceed the higher rate threshold, the excess will be subject to 24% CGT. 

These rates also apply to gains from the sale of residential property, except for a principal private residence (PPR), which is usually exempt from CGT. Most homeowners don’t pay CGT when selling their main family home but gains from other types of property may be taxable.

This includes:

• Buy-to-let properties
• Business premises
• Land
• Inherited property

Any CGT due on the sale of UK residential property must usually be reported and paid within 60 days of the completion date. This means a CGT return must be submitted and a payment on account made, within that 60-day window.

Failing to meet the deadline can lead to penalties and interest, so it’s important to plan ahead and ensure timely reporting whenever a non-PPR property is sold. And if required, we can help you with the computations and filing formalities.

Employers must act now to meet the deadline for paying Class 1A NICs for 2024–25 to avoid HMRC penalties. These contributions are due by 19 July 2025 if paying by post, or by 22 July 2025 for electronic payments. Class 1A NICs apply to most taxable benefits given to employees and directors, including company cars and private medical cover. Employers should ensure payments are correctly referenced using their Accounts Office reference number and clearly mark the relevant tax year. Importantly, July payments always relate to the previous tax year, even if made in the new tax year.

Class 1A NICs are payable by employers on the value of most taxable benefits offered to employees and directors, such as company cars and private medical insurance. They also apply to any portion of termination payments exceeding £30,000, provided Class 1 NICs have not already been deducted.

To ensure payments are correctly allocated, employers should use their Accounts Office reference number as the payment reference and clearly indicate the relevant tax year and month. Note that Class 1A NICs paid in July always relate to the previous tax year.

These contributions typically apply to benefits provided to company directors, employees, individuals in controlling positions, and their family or household members.

As of April 2025, more employers can claim the increased £10,500 Employment Allowance thanks to relaxed eligibility rules. This increase will help employers reduce some of the impact of the recent increases in employers' NIC.

The Employment Allowance allows eligible employers to reduce their National Insurance liability. The current allowance that applies from April 2025 is £10,500. Previously, the allowance was £5,000 per year. You can claim less than the maximum if this covers your total Class 1 NIC bill. 

A claim for the Employment Allowance is usually made when filing your Employer Payment Summary (EPS) as part of the Real Time Information (RTI) submissions to HMRC.

The previous eligibility restriction, which limited the allowance to businesses with less than £100,000 in annual employer NIC liabilities, was removed with effect from April 2025. This change means that more employers can now qualify for the allowance.

Connected employers or those with multiple PAYE schemes will have their contributions aggregated to assess eligibility for the allowance. The Employment Allowance can be used against employer Class 1 NICs liability. It cannot be used against Class 1A or Class 1B NICs liabilities. The allowance can only be claimed once across all employer’s PAYE schemes or connected companies. De minimis state aid rules may also apply in restricting the use of the allowance.

Employment Allowance claims need to be re-submitted each tax year. There are a number of excluded categories where employers cannot claim the employment allowance. This includes limited companies with a single director and no other employees, employees whose earnings are within IR35 ‘off-payroll working rules’ and someone you employ for personal, household or domestic work (unless they are a carer or support worker).

1 August 2025 – Due date for corporation tax due for the year ended 31 October 2024.

19 August 2025 – PAYE and NIC deductions due for month ended 5 August 2025 (If you pay your tax electronically the due date is 22 August 2025)

19 August 2025 – Filing deadline for the CIS300 monthly return for the month ended 5 August 2025. 

19 August 2025 – CIS tax deducted for the month ended 5 August 2025 is payable by today.

1 September 2025 – Due date for corporation tax due for the year ended 30 November 2024.

19 September 2025 – PAYE and NIC deductions due for month ended 5 September 2025. (If you pay your tax electronically the due date is 22 September 2025)

19 September 2025 – Filing deadline for the CIS300 monthly return for the month ended 5 September 2025. 

19 September 2025 – CIS tax deducted for the month ended 5 September 2025 is payable by today.

A Tribunal has provided a landmark ruling over employer-employee status in the context of direct payments made under the Care Act 2014, ruling that an LA was not in fact the direct employer of a carer. The appeal revolved around the question of whether the LA was the de facto employer of V, who had provided care and support to his adult brother, S, between 2013 and 2020. V was paid directly by the LA via the Care Act 2014 under a contract of employment. 

V claimed race and disability discrimination, as well as payment arrears, asserting a formal employment relationship with the LA. The Appeal Tribunal rejected all of V's claims and found no error of law in the original Tribunal’s approach, as there was no basis for an implied contract with V. The Tribunal’s findings of fact, such as his brother S's control of the budget, payslips naming S, and their family arranging cover, clearly pointed to S as the employer. The test for implying such a contract is a "necessity" in explaining the parties' actions, which was not met here, given the express contract with S.

As such, direct payments are a valid method by which an LA may discharge its statutory duty under the Care Act 2014. As to the issue of S's capacity to enter into a contract of employment, the Judge agreed with the LA that capacity is a matter for medical evidence and not mere assertion. Even if S had lacked capacity, it would have made the contract voidable, not void, and would not have necessitated an implied contract with the LA. This decision strongly affirms that LAs can effectively discharge their statutory duties under the Care Act 2014 by making direct payments, without automatically becoming the employer of the carers. This case illustrates how courts will seek to determine the identity of the employer in such direct payment arrangements. Those employed via such direct payment schemes are unlikely to be able to claim employment status with the LA unless there is compelling evidence that the LA retained significant and direct control over their day-to-day work. This case has far-reaching implications for freelancers and so employers should always seek to clarify whether any direct payments constitute a formal employer-employee relationship to avoid legal pitfalls.