Skip to main content

P45s, P11Ds and P60s – what are they?

Most employees will come across forms such as the P45, P11D and P60 during their working life, and knowing what each one is for can make it much easier to keep track of your tax position.

A P45 is issued to employees who leave their employment or lose their job. The P45 shows how much tax you have paid during the current tax year (6 April to 5 April). The form has four parts: your employer sends Part 1 to HMRC, gives you Part 1A for your records, and you pass Parts 2 and 3 to your new employer or Jobcentre Plus. Employers are legally required to issue a P45. If you do not have one, for example when starting your first job then your new employer will ask for details via a starter checklist to determine your correct tax code.

A P11D form is used by employers to list certain ‘benefits in kind’ provided to directors or employees. P11D forms are used to provide information to HMRC on all Benefits in Kind (BiKs), including those under the Optional Remuneration Arrangements (OpRAs) unless the employer has registered to payroll benefits. Payrolling benefits removes the requirement to complete a P11D for the selected benefits. The completed P11D form is submitted annually to HMRC. The deadline for submitting the 2025-26 form is 6 July 2026. The form can be submitted using commercial software or via HMRC’s PAYE online service.

The P60 is a statement issued to employees after the end of each tax year that shows the amount of tax they have paid on their salary. Employers can provide the P60 form on paper or electronically. Employees should ensure they keep their P60s in a safe place as it is an important record of the amount of tax paid. The deadline for employers to provide employees with a copy of their P60 form for the 2025-26 tax year is 31 May 2026. A P60 must be given to all employees that were on the payroll on the last day of the 2025-26 tax year.

Updating your tax code

It is quite common for tax codes to be wrong, particularly if your income or employment situation has changed, so it is worth taking a few moments to check that HMRC has the correct information about you.

HMRC usually updates your tax code automatically when your income changes, using information provided by your employer. However, if HMRC has inaccurate details about your income you may be given an incorrect tax code. To fix this, ensure HMRC has your up-to-date income details and check what you need to do if you are on an emergency tax code.

If you believe your tax code is wrong, you can use HMRC’s Check your Income Tax online service to update employment details or to report income changes that might affect your tax code. For example, you can add company benefits, missing income sources, claim employment expenses and update your estimated taxable income. HMRC may then adjust your tax code based on these updates.

If you cannot access the online service, you can contact HMRC directly. Once your details are updated, HMRC will inform both you and your employer or pension provider if your tax code changes. Your next payslip should show your new code and any corrections to your pay.

At the end of the tax year, if you have paid too much or too little tax, HMRC will issue either a P800 tax calculation letter or a Simple Assessment letter to explain any refund or amount owed.

Tell HMRC about unpaid tax on cryptoassets

Where cryptoasset tokens (also known as cryptocurrency) are held personally, this investment is usually undertaken in the hope of making a capital appreciation in its value or to make particular purchases. 

HMRC is clear that these holdings will usually be subject to Capital Gains Tax (CGT) if there is a gain when disposing of these assets by: 

  • selling tokens
  • exchanging tokens for a different type of cryptoasset
  • using tokens to pay for goods or services
  • giving away tokens to another person (unless it is a gift to your spouse, civil partner or charity)

If you have unpaid tax on cryptoasset gains, there is a specific voluntary disclosure service that can be used. This service can be used for exchange tokens (such as bitcoin), NFTs (non-fungible tokens) and utility tokens.

Before making a voluntary disclosure, you will need to: 

  • collect information about the cryptoassets you owe tax on; 
  • work out how many years you need to declare unpaid tax for; 
  • work out the CGT and Income Tax you owe; and 
  • work out any interest you owe. 
  • work out any penalties you will be liable for 

The number of years you must disclose unpaid tax depends on why it was not paid correctly. If you took reasonable care but still underpaid, you must disclose and pay for the last four years. If you did not take care, you must disclose for six years. However, if you deliberately failed to pay or knowingly gave incorrect information, you must disclose and pay for up to 20 years of unpaid tax.

Your disclosure must include all unpaid tax, interest and penalties. You can use HMRC’s calculators to work out the correct interest and penalty amounts. Once you submit your disclosure, HMRC will usually issue a payment reference number within 15 working days, and you must pay the full amount within 30 days of submitting a disclosure.

After reviewing your disclosure, HMRC will either send you a letter confirming acceptance of your offer or contact you if it cannot be accepted. If HMRC finds that you knowingly provided false or incorrect information, they may reopen your tax affairs and can impose higher penalties.

Tread carefully when using temporary contracts to confer tax breaks

A recent ruling has established that temporary worker arrangements do not constitute a single, continuous employment relationship in which workers retain the unfettered right to refuse assignments. This effectively confirms the prerequisite for a mutuality of obligation when accruing tax breaks.

Mainpay engaged temporary workers in the service sector, contending that its employment relationship constituted a single, albeit discontinuous form of employment, effectively rendering its various workplaces transient. Based on this viewpoint, Mainpay reimbursed its workers for travel and subsistence expenses and deducted these amounts from their income for tax purposes. Mainpay also used rounded sums, or benchmark scales, for subsistence expenses without obtaining formal dispensation from HMRC.

HMRC argued that each assignment was a separate instance of employment, making each workplace permanent for the purpose of a given assignment. This meant that travel and subsistence expenses were likely non-deductible without dispensation.

As the two contracts in question (2010 & 2013) were issued more than four years after the relevant tax year, this required HMRC to prove that the loss of tax was "brought about carelessly" by Mainpay so as to justify a six-year extended time limit. The Tribunal ruled in their favour, finding that neither the 2010 nor the 2013 contract constituted overarching contracts of employment, as the workers retained the unfettered right to refuse assignments. This, in turn, meant they lacked the necessary mutuality of obligation in the gaps between assignments. The Tribunal held that each assignment was an instance of separate employment and that the workplaces were therefore, in effect, permanent, making the expenses non-deductible. The Tribunal also found that Mainpay was "careless" in claiming the deductions, particularly in relation to the 2010 contract, because it had relied on vague assurances from employment lawyers.

This contention was escalated to the Court of Appeal, which rejected Mainpay’s argument that the parties’ intention should be decisive in construing the contract, as what essentially mattered was the reality of the arrangement, which was one of intermittent employment. Thus, each assignment was effectively under a separate contract of employment for the purposes of the Income Tax (Earnings and Pensions) Act 2003 (ITEPA) and, therefore, created a permanent workplace. The Court further upheld the finding that the loss of tax was "brought about carelessly" by Mainpay, validating the extended assessment time limit permitted under the Taxes Management Act 1970 (TMA).  

The case provides a clear distinction between a general agreement that governs future work and an actual contract of employment that lays out the terms under which future, separate contracts of employment will be formed. This type of agreement alone does not create a state of continuous employment. Companies are thus advised to seek advice when creating discontinuous employment frameworks in an effort to minimise tax liabilities.

Reviewing insurance cover

Many businesses arrange insurance in the early days and then only look at it again when something changes, or when a renewal comes around. The difficulty with this approach is that risks evolve over time, and gaps in cover often only become visible when there is a claim. A short review with an insurance broker can help ensure that your policies reflect how the business currently operates and that protection remains adequate.

Business interruption

Business interruption cover is often misunderstood. It is designed to replace lost income while the business recovers from damage or disruption. The key issue is whether the indemnity period is long enough. If specialist equipment or premises are involved, recovery may take longer than expected. A broker can help evaluate assumptions and adjust cover accordingly.

Cyber risk

Cyber-attacks are now common across all sectors, not just large companies. Standard insurance policies rarely cover data breaches or ransomware incidents. Cyber insurance provides technical support as well as financial cover, which can make a major difference to recovery time.

Directors and officers

Directors and senior managers can face personal claims in relation to decisions they make. Reviewing Directors and Officers cover ensures that the right individuals are protected and that policy limits match the scale of business activity.

Supply chain and contractors

If contractors or suppliers are key to operations, it is worth checking who is responsible for what. Contracts should make insurance obligations clear, and your own policies should reflect any outsourced work.

Asset values and inflation

Rising costs mean many assets are now underinsured. Reassessing replacement values can prevent reduced payouts in the event of a claim.

A brief annual review can provide reassurance and avoid unwelcome surprises. If you would like support preparing for that conversation, we can help.