If your company profits sit between £50,000 and £250,000, marginal relief can soften the jump from 19% to 25% Corporation Tax.

The Corporation Tax main rate applies to companies with taxable profits above £250,000 and is currently set at 25%. Companies with profits of up to £50,000 are subject to the Small Profits Rate, which remains at 19%.

For companies with profits falling between £50,000 and £250,000, marginal relief applies. This creates a gradual increase in the effective rate of Corporation Tax between the small profits and main rates, rather than a sudden jump. The lower and upper profit limits are proportionately reduced where an accounting period is shorter than 12 months or where a company has associated companies.

The effect of marginal relief is that the effective Corporation Tax rate increases steadily from 19% once profits exceed £50,000, reaching the full 25% rate when profits exceed £250,000.

In practice, Corporation Tax is calculated by applying the main rate of 25% to total taxable profits and then deducting the marginal relief due. The marginal relief standard fraction is 3/200. HMRC provides an online marginal relief calculator to help companies determine the correct amount of Corporation Tax payable based on their profit level and circumstances.

The Chancellor, Rachel Reeves has confirmed that she will deliver the Spring Statement to the House of Commons on Tuesday, 3 March 2026.

The Spring Statement is used to give an update on the state of the economy and will respond to the economic and fiscal forecast published by the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR). The Spring Statement also presents an opportunity for the government to publish consultations, including initiating early-stage calls for evidence and consultations on long-term tax policy issues.

The OBR has executive responsibility for producing the official UK economic and fiscal forecasts, evaluating the government’s performance against its fiscal targets, assessing the sustainability of and risks to the public finances and scrutinising government tax and welfare spending.

Usually, major policy and tax changes are announced at the Budget, and it remains to be seen whether there will be any significant announcements in the upcoming Spring Statement. The next Budget is expected to take place later this year in the Autumn.

The High Court recently ruled on the interpretation and enforceability of “discretionary” bonus provisions in employment contracts. Mr. Gagliardi brought a breach of employment contract claim against a former hedge fund which had contracted him as a senior portfolio manager. The contract in question included a salary, a sign-on payment, a new-issue bonus, and a discretionary bonus based on profitable revenues. Mr. Gagliardi was specifically recruited by the CEO to expand into the US market owing to his expertise in block trading and his valuable relationships with major US banks. The hedge fund’s primary goal was to secure the benefit of these relationships and scale its business quickly, with the CEO tacitly acknowledging that they were essentially “buying his relationships,” hiring Mr. Gagliardi on a “trade and get paid” basis.

Upon joining, Mr. Gagliardi immediately began actively trading in the A1 share class without completing his onboarding process or receiving formal risk limits, leading to conflict with the CIO and risk manager. However, the CEO consistently prioritised Mr. Gagliardi’s trading activity over internal procedure, despite him often exceeding specified trading limits, frequently granting retrospective approval. Mr. Gagliardi’s lack of attention to compliance was also overlooked, as the CEO continued to prioritise profitability. However, a market-wide regulatory inquiry into block trading led to subpoenas to the claimant and the hedge fund by early 2022, prompting the fund to withhold payment of his discretionary bonus. This led the claimant to sue the hedge fund for breach of contract.

The High Court ruled in favour of Mr. Gagliardi, awarding him $5.385m in damages (plus interest), determining that his former hedge fund had indeed breached its contractual obligations in failing to award him any discretionary bonus for his trading activities in 2021. The Judge ruled that the hedge fund’s contractual discretion (governed by Delaware law) was neither broad nor unfettered and, as such, was subject to prescribed contractual criteria.

Despite the use of the term “discretionary,” the High Court has affirmed the principle that an employer’s discretion is not absolute where a bonus is tied to measurable performance criteria such as revenue contributions and profits. This ruling emphasises that, where an employee delivers exceptional financial performance, an employer cannot arbitrarily or irrationally refuse to pay a bonus, as this would constitute a breach of contract, irrespective of any allegations of minor breaches, misconduct or poor attitude that did not reach the threshold for disciplinary action or termination over the period in question. Employers should thus take care over phraseology when structuring discretionary bonuses into contracts.

When a small business applies for a bank loan, the bank is mainly trying to answer one question, “How likely is it that we will be repaid, on time and in full?” To reach that decision, they will review a mix of financial evidence, trading performance and the overall risk profile of the business.

A key factor is affordability. Banks will look at recent accounts, tax returns (where relevant) and up to date management figures to see whether profits and cash flow can comfortably cover the proposed repayments. They will often request bank statements to understand day to day cash movement, whether income is stable and whether the business regularly runs tight on cash or relies heavily on an overdraft.

They will also assess the quality of the borrower. This includes the business credit record, payment history and any missed payments or County Court Judgements. In many cases the personal credit history of the directors or business owners will be reviewed as well, particularly for smaller companies or newer businesses.

Security is another important area. For secured lending the bank will consider what assets are available, such as property, vehicles, equipment or investments and the likely value if sold. For unsecured borrowing, banks may request a personal guarantee, which gives them extra protection if the business cannot repay.

Banks will also look closely at what the loan is for. Funding that supports growth, improves productivity or helps smooth short term cash flow tends to be viewed more positively than borrowing that simply plugs ongoing losses. A clear plan, realistic forecasts and evidence of customer demand can strengthen an application.

Finally, the bank may assess the wider trading outlook, sector risk and how dependent the business is on a small number of clients or suppliers. The stronger and more consistent the business looks, the better the chances of approval.

A person’s credit rating (often referred to as a credit score) is a measure used by lenders to assess how reliably someone manages borrowing and financial commitments. It can affect whether credit is offered at all, the interest rate charged and even the size of deposit required for certain products. Although each lender uses its own scoring system, most look at similar underlying factors.

One of the biggest influences is payment history. Missing payments on credit cards, loans, overdrafts, mobile phone contracts or buy now pay later agreements can have a negative impact. Even one late payment can reduce a score, while repeated late payments suggest ongoing financial pressure.

The level of borrowing also matters. Lenders consider overall debt, how much available credit is being used and whether borrowing is increasing over time. For example, using most of a credit card limit may indicate higher risk, even if payments are made on time.

A person’s credit history length can also affect their rating. Someone with a longer track record of managing credit sensibly often scores better than someone with little or no borrowing history, even if they are financially secure.

Frequent applications for credit can reduce a score in the short term. Multiple searches in a short period may suggest financial difficulty or over reliance on borrowing.

Another key factor is the stability of personal details. Being registered on the electoral roll at the current address can improve a credit profile, as it helps lenders verify identity. Regularly moving home or having inconsistent address records, can make a person appear higher risk.

Errors can also play a part. Incorrect information, financial links to another person (such as a former partner) or outdated details can damage a credit rating unfairly, so it is worth checking a credit report from time to time.

Finally, it is important to remember that credit scoring is not just about debt, it is about behaviour. A steady pattern of borrowing, prompt repayments and tidy records generally leads to a stronger credit rating over time.