The way we meet has changed dramatically in recent years. Technology now makes it possible to discuss projects, close deals and hold team meetings without ever leaving our desks. Yet for many, there is still something powerful about sitting across the table from another person. Both formats have their place, and the right choice often depends on purpose, people and context.

Online meetings are efficient. They remove the need for travel, save time and allow busy people to meet at short notice. For businesses with remote staff or clients across the country, video calls make communication easy and inexpensive. Online platforms also allow for screen sharing, document collaboration, and recording, all of which can make discussions more productive.

However, virtual meetings can have drawbacks. Technical glitches, weak connections and background distractions can interrupt the flow. It can also be harder to read body language or sense engagement, especially in larger groups. Without informal conversation before or after a meeting, relationships can feel more functional than personal.

Meeting in person allows for a deeper level of connection. Subtle cues, tone, and eye contact help build trust and understanding, especially when sensitive or complex matters are involved. Negotiations, strategic planning and first introductions often benefit from a personal touch. The act of meeting physically can also signal commitment and importance.

The disadvantages are mainly practical. Face-to-face meetings take more time and often involve travel costs. Coordinating diaries can be difficult and the environmental impact of regular travel is increasingly questioned.

For most businesses, a mix works best. Routine updates and quick check-ins are well suited to online meetings, while major decisions, negotiations, or relationship-building sessions still benefit from being held in person. The key is to choose the setting that best supports the outcome you want to achieve.

HMRC has issued a press release urging 18-23 year olds who have yet to claim their Child Trust Fund (CTF) cash to do so as soon as possible. According to HMRC, over 758,000 young adults in this age group have unclaimed funds, with the average savings pot estimated to be around £2,240.

Anyone who turned 18 on or after 1 September 2020 could have unclaimed money in a dormant CTF. Parents of children aged 18-23 should also check if their children have claimed the funds to which they are entitled.

Children born between 1 September 2002 and 2 January 2011 were eligible for a CTF account, with the government contributing an initial deposit, typically at least £250. These accounts were set up as long-term savings for newly born children.

HMRC’s Second Permanent Secretary and Deputy Chief Executive, said:

‘If you’re between 18 and 23, you could be sat on a savings payout and not even realise it. Just search ‘find my Child Trust Fund’ on GOV.UK to find your savings account today.’

More than 563,000 young people went online to find their CTF in the 12 months to August 2025. September 2024 was the busiest month when over 71,000 searches were submitted.

Approximately 6.3 million Child Trust Fund (CTF) accounts were created during the scheme's operation. If a parent or guardian was unable to open an account for their child, HMRC stepped in and set up a savings account on the child’s behalf.

Certain buildings, land, works of art, and other objects of national significance may be exempt from Inheritance Tax and Capital Gains Tax (CGT) when they are transferred to a new owner. This exemption applies under a special tax relief for national heritage assets that are either gifted or bequeathed.

To qualify for this relief, the asset must meet at least one of the following criteria:

• Buildings, estates or parklands of outstanding historical or architectural interest
• Land of outstanding natural beauty and spectacular views
• Land of outstanding scientific interest including special areas for the conservation of wildlife, plants and trees
• Objects with national scientific, historic or artistic interest, either in their own right or due to a connection with historical buildings

Upon transfer of ownership, the new owner is required to enter into a formal agreement, known as ‘the undertakings. This agreement ensures that the asset will be cared for, made available for public viewing, and retained in the UK. Failure to meet these conditions, or selling the asset, results in the revocation of the tax exemption under the Conditional Exemption Tax Incentive scheme. As a consequence, the asset would then be subject to tax in accordance with the standard rules.

HMRC is guided by the government’s heritage advisory agencies in deciding which assets qualify for exemption.

When a couple is separating or undergoing divorce proceedings, tax issues are often not the first thing on their minds. However, alongside the emotional challenges, it is important to understand the tax implications of divorce can have a significant impact.

Changes to the Capital Gains Tax (CGT) rules for divorcing couples took effect on 6 April 2023. These changes extended the period during which spouses and civil partners can make transfers between each other without triggering CGT. The no gain/no loss rule now lasts up to three years after they stop living together. Additionally, if the couple has a formal divorce agreement, there is no time limit for these transfers. Before this change, the no gain/no loss treatment only applied to disposals in the tax year of the separation.

There are also specific rules for people who continue to have a financial interest in their former family home after separating. These rules allow them to claim private residence relief (PRR) when the home is eventually sold, provided certain conditions are met.

During divorce proceedings, it is crucial to reach a fair financial agreement, if possible, as this can help avoid further legal complications. If an agreement cannot be reached, the court may step in to issue a "financial order." Both parties and their advisers should also carefully consider the future of the family home, any family businesses, and the potential Inheritance Tax consequences of the separation or divorce.

Married couples and civil partners could save up to £252 a year by transferring part of one partner’s unused personal allowance to the other, but you may need to cancel the claim if your income or relationship status changes.

The Marriage Allowance applies to married couples and civil partners where one partner does not pay tax or does not pay tax above the basic rate threshold for Income Tax (i.e., one partner must earn less than the £12,570 personal allowance for 2025-26).

The allowance allows the lower-earning partner to transfer up to £1,260 of their unused personal tax-free allowance to their spouse or civil partner. The transfer can only be made if the recipient (the higher-earning partner) is taxed at the basic 20% rate, which typically means they have an income between £12,571 and £50,270. For those living in Scotland, this would usually apply to an income between £12,571 and £43,662.

By using the allowance, the lower-earning partner can transfer up to £1,260 of their unused personal allowance, which could result in an annual tax saving of up to £252 for the recipient (20% of £1,260).

However, it is important to be aware you must cancel the Marriage Allowance if your circumstances change and any of the following apply:

• your relationship ends – because you have divorced, ended (‘dissolved’) your civil partnership or legally separated;
• your income changes and you are no longer eligible; or
• you no longer want to claim.