Author: Glenn

Planning to sell your business or shares? Capital Gains Tax rates for Business Asset Disposal Relief (BADR) are set to rise from 10% to 14% on 6 April 2025, and to 18% from 6 April 2026. Selling before these dates could result in significant tax savings.

Business Asset Disposal Relief (BADR) applies to the sale of a business, shares in a trading company, or an individual’s interest in a trading partnership. When this relief is available, a reduced Capital Gains Tax (CGT) rate of 10% is currently applied instead of the standard rate, potentially resulting in significant tax savings for those exiting their business.

It is important to note the future increases in the CGT rate for BADR that were announced as part of the Autumn Budget measures. The CGT rate for BADR will increase to 14% for disposals made on or after 6 April 2025. A further increase to 18% will apply for disposals made on or after 6 April 2026.

For business owners contemplating an exit strategy, the coming months might be an opportune time to consider selling before the upcoming changes take effect on 6 April 2025.

Currently, you can claim a total of £1 million in BADR over your lifetime, allowing you to qualify for the relief multiple times. The lifetime limit may be higher if you sold assets before 11 March 2020. No changes were made to this lifetime limit in the recent Budget.

The lifetime limit for Investors’ Relief was reduced in the Autumn Budget to £1 million (from £10 million) for qualifying disposals made on or after 30 October 2024. The CGT rates for Investors’ Relief mirror those for BADR.

The Chancellor’s Spring Statement, scheduled for 26 March 2025, is expected to focus on navigating the challenges of public finances, economic growth, and household pressures.

Economic Context

The UK economy is forecast to grow by 2% in 2025, though inflation is projected to remain above the Bank of England's 2% target for several more years. This economic backdrop follows significant tax increases announced in the October 2024 Budget, where £40 billion in measures were introduced, including raising employers' National Insurance contributions from 13.8% to 15% for salaries above £5,000. These policies have triggered concerns across businesses and households, compounding challenges for an economy still recovering from previous shocks.

Taxation and Public Finances

Despite the £40 billion in tax hikes, a £22 billion deficit in public finances has been identified, suggesting further fiscal measures may be necessary. Economists anticipate additional increases in capital gains and inheritance taxes as the government seeks to address this shortfall. Meanwhile, the rise in employers' National Insurance contributions has created significant burdens on businesses, particularly in labour-intensive industries like retail and hospitality, raising concerns about job losses and reduced investment.

Business Challenges

Business confidence has dipped to its lowest level in two years, with many companies reducing staff due to rising employment costs. December 2024 saw the fastest rate of job cuts in four years, highlighting the strain on businesses. The government may need to consider targeted support for struggling sectors to counteract the impact of its tax policies and foster stability.

Household Finances

Households are bracing for rising costs in 2025, with food prices expected to increase by up to 4.9%, energy bills climbing, and mortgage payments potentially rising if there are further interest rate hikes. Stamp duty thresholds are set to drop in April, increasing costs for property buyers, and rail fares are expected to rise by 4.6% from March. These pressures will likely lead to calls for government intervention to support families.

Potential Policy Adjustments

The Chancellor could use the Spring Statement to refine some of the policies introduced in the Autumn Budget. Possible measures include adjustments to the National Insurance increase, which has proven particularly controversial. Additionally, there may be new proposals targeting Inheritance and Capital Gains taxes to help bridge the fiscal deficit. Support for businesses, such as reliefs or incentives, might also feature to counteract declining confidence and rising unemployment. For households, the government could announce measures to ease financial pressures, such as subsidies for energy bills or targeted support for low-income families.

Conclusion

The Spring Statement presents an opportunity for the Chancellor to balance fiscal discipline with much-needed support for businesses and households. As stakeholders across sectors await the announcements, the government’s response will be crucial in shaping the UK’s economic outlook.

The average number of touchpoints needed to secure a sale, or appointment generally falls between 7 and 12. However, this varies by industry, target audience, and product or service type. Here’s why multiple touchpoints are necessary and how they work:

Why Multiple Touchpoints Are Necessary

• Building Trust: Buyers need to trust the seller, and trust develops over time through consistent and meaningful engagement.
• Cutting Through Noise: Prospects are inundated with marketing messages, so repeated interactions ensure your message stands out.
• Guiding the Buyer’s Journey: Buyers often move through awareness, consideration, and decision stages before committing. Multiple touchpoints help guide them.
• Relevance and Customisation: Frequent contact allows you to refine your messaging and address specific concerns, making your offering more appealing.

Typical Sales Touchpoints

• Awareness Stage: Social media ads, blog visits, email newsletters, or website engagement.
• Engagement Stage: Personalised LinkedIn messages, phone calls, or direct email outreach.
• Consideration Stage: Webinars, product demonstrations, or sharing case studies and testimonials.
• Decision Stage: Proposal discussions, follow-up calls to address objections, or in-person meetings to finalise details.

Factors Affecting the Number of Touchpoints

• Industry: B2B sales or high-ticket items typically need more interactions (10–15+), while consumer sales might only require 3–5 touchpoints.
• Lead Type: Warm leads, such as referrals, may convert faster, while cold leads from unsolicited outreach require more nurturing.
• Approach: A strategic follow-up plan can reduce the number of touchpoints needed by effectively addressing concerns early on.
• Communication Channels: Some channels, like personalised phone calls or in-person meetings, can fast-track trust and reduce unnecessary follow-ups.

Strategies to Reduce Touchpoints

• Personalisation: Craft messages tailored to the prospect’s specific needs to make each interaction more impactful.
• Multi-Channel Outreach: Engage prospects across email, phone, social media, and in-person to reach them in their preferred way.
• Pre-Qualification: Focus on well-targeted leads to reduce wasted efforts and ensure efficient use of touchpoints.
• Automation: Leverage tools to automate routine touchpoints, such as follow-up emails or reminders, while maintaining a personal touch.

Key Takeaway

While the general range is 7–12 touchpoints, prioritising quality over quantity is essential. Strategic, timely, and relevant engagement will always outperform excessive, unfocused interactions.

The economic outlook for the UK in 2025 presents a mixed picture, with expectations of modest growth tempered by persistent inflationary pressures.

Growth Projections

The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) has revised its forecast for UK economic growth in 2025 upward to 1.7%, citing increased government spending as a key driver.

This adjustment reflects the UK's resilience amid global economic uncertainties and aligns with its broader strategy to stimulate growth through fiscal policies and structural reforms.

Inflation Concerns

Despite the positive growth outlook, inflation remains a significant concern. The OECD projects that UK inflation will average 2.7% in 2025, the highest among G7 nations. This is attributed to strong wage growth and elevated services inflation, indicating persistent domestic price pressures.

Monetary Policy

In response to these dynamics, the Bank of England (BoE) has begun adjusting its monetary policy. In November 2024, the BoE reduced its interest rate from 5% to 4.75%, marking the second cut since 2020. However, the BoE has signalled that future rate reductions will be gradual, given the rising inflation expectations.

Analysts anticipate that the BoE will continue to lower rates cautiously throughout 2025, potentially reaching 3.75% by year-end.

Fiscal Policy and Public Debt

The UK's fiscal policy is poised to play a pivotal role in shaping the economic landscape. The March 2024 budget introduced measures aimed at stimulating growth, including increased public spending and tax adjustments. However, these initiatives have raised concerns about fiscal sustainability, with public debt projected to rise to 92.8% of GDP in 2025.

The OECD warns that the UK's stretched public finances may limit its capacity to address potential economic shocks in the future.

Labour Market and Business Sentiment

The labour market is expected to experience moderate improvements, with businesses expressing cautious optimism. Surveys indicate that a significant proportion of firms anticipate revenue growth and increased hiring in 2025, supporting the government's efforts to revive economic growth.

However, challenges such as rising national insurance contributions and persistent inflation may temper this optimism.

Conclusion

In summary, the UK's economic outlook for 2025 suggests a period of modest growth accompanied by persistent inflationary pressures. The interplay between fiscal stimulus and monetary policy adjustments will be crucial in navigating these challenges. While increased government spending may bolster economic activity, concerns about inflation and public debt sustainability remain pertinent. Stakeholders, including policymakers and businesses, will need to balance these factors to foster a stable and sustainable economic environment in the coming year.

The UK government has recently addressed the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman's (PHSO) report concerning the communication of changes to women's State Pension age. The PHSO identified maladministration by the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) due to a 28-month delay in informing women born in the 1950s about these changes. In response, the government has acknowledged this finding and issued an apology.

PHSO Investigation Findings

The PHSO's investigation focused on how the DWP communicated these changes, not the policy decisions themselves. The findings were:

• 1995 to 2004: The DWP provided adequate and accurate information through various channels, including leaflets, campaigns, and its website.
• 2005 to 2007: Decision-making during this period led to a 28-month delay in sending personalized letters to affected women, which the PHSO deemed maladministration.
• Impact: While the delay constituted maladministration, the PHSO concluded it did not cause direct financial loss. However, it acknowledged that some women lost opportunities to make informed financial decisions, diminishing their sense of autonomy and control.

Government's Response

Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall accepted the finding of maladministration and issued an apology for the delay in communication. She emphasized the government's commitment to learning from this case to prevent similar issues in the future.

Despite acknowledging the communication failures, the government has decided against providing financial compensation. This decision is based on evidence suggesting that unsolicited letters are often ineffective; research indicates that only one in four people recall receiving unexpected letters. Additionally, the government argues that the majority of 1950s-born women were aware of the impending changes, and earlier communication would not have significantly altered this awareness.

The government also considered the financial implications of compensation. Proposals for a flat-rate compensation scheme, with payments ranging from £1,000 to £2,950 per individual, were estimated to cost between £3.5 billion and £10.5 billion. Given the belief that most women were already aware of the changes, the government deemed such expenditure an unjustifiable use of taxpayer funds.

Reactions and Implications

The decision not to offer compensation has been met with criticism from advocacy groups, particularly the Women Against State Pension Inequality (WASPI) campaign. They argue that inadequate communication left many women unprepared for the changes, leading to financial hardship. The government's stance has also sparked debate among policymakers and the public about the adequacy of communication strategies and the responsibility of the state in ensuring citizens are well-informed about significant policy changes.

Conclusion

While the government has acknowledged and apologized for the delays in communicating changes to the State Pension age for women born in the 1950s, it has decided against offering financial compensation. This decision is based on evidence suggesting that earlier communication may not have significantly increased awareness and concerns about the proportionality of compensation costs. The situation underscores the importance of effective communication in policy implementation and has prompted discussions about how to better inform the public about significant changes that impact their financial planning and well-being.