Skip to main content

Author: Glenn

Payrolling employee benefits

Employers can voluntarily register to report and account for tax on certain benefits and expenses via the RTI system before the start of the tax year. This process, known as payrolling, eliminates the need to submit P11D forms for the selected benefits at the end of the tax year.

The deadline for submitting P11D, P11D(b), and P9D forms for the 2024-25 tax year is 6 July 2025. These forms can be submitted via commercial software or HMRC’s PAYE online service, as HMRC no longer accepts paper submissions. Employees must also receive a copy of the information by the same date.

Employees must also be provided with a copy of the information relating to them on these forms by the same date. P11D forms are used to provide information to HMRC on all Benefits in Kind (BiKs), including those under the Optional Remuneration Arrangements (OpRAs) unless the employer has registered to payroll benefits.

A P11D(b) is still required for Class 1A National Insurance payments regardless of whether the benefits are being reported via P11D or payrolled. The deadline for paying Class 1A NICs is 22 July 2025 (or 19 July if paying by cheque).

If no benefits are provided during the tax year, employers can either submit a 'nil' return or notify HMRC that no return is required. Penalties apply for late submissions or payments, of £100 per 50 employees for each month a P11D(b) is late.

Selling online and paying tax

Selling online? Whether it’s a hobby or a business, you may need to pay tax if your earnings exceed £1,000. From services to content creation, it’s vital to understand self-assessment rules and new reporting obligations for online platforms starting in 2024.

If you are selling anything through an online marketplace, it is important to know that you might be liable to pay tax, whether it is your main source of income or just something a part-time hobby. This applies to a range of activities, so it is worth understanding when you need to register for self-assessment and pay tax.

You may need to report your earnings and pay tax if you are doing any of the following:

  • Buying goods to resell, or making things to sell (even if it’s just a hobby that you sell items from);
  • Offering services online, such as dog walking, gardening, repairs, tutoring, food delivery, babysitting, or hiring out equipment;
  • Creating online content, whether that's videos, podcasts, or even social media influencing; or
  • Earning income by renting out property or land, like letting a holiday home, running a bed and breakfast, or renting out a parking space on your driveway.

There is a Trading Allowance you can claim that allows you to earn up to £1,000 a year from self-employment without having to pay tax or register as self-employed. But if you go over that £1,000 threshold, you will need to register with HMRC as self-employed and submit a self-assessment tax return.

If you are just selling personal items, such as second-hand clothes or unwanted electrical goods, you typically do not need to worry about registering for tax. This is not considered a business activity, so it does not count as trading in the eyes of HMRC.

For those using online platforms to sell goods or services, there are new reporting obligations. Any relevant information about your sales may be reported to HMRC by the platform you use. There is a new requirement for online platforms to report pertinent information collected about online sellers between 1 January 2024 to 31 December 2024 to HMRC by 31 January 2025. This will only happen if you have sold 30 or more items or earned £1,700 (or €2,000) in the calendar year. The platform will also provide you with a copy of the information they send to HMRC, which can be helpful when you need to submit your own tax return.

Beware the legal minefield of the transferring of contractual undertakings

A recent case [London United Busways Ltd. (LUB) v De Marchi and Abellio London [2024] EAT 191] revealed the complexities of working under the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006, or TUPE.

A Mr. De Marchi had been working as a bus driver for two decades by LUB from his local bus depot, even though his contract contained a clause to the effect that employees may be expected to work at any of the depots across London. After LUB lost its tender for his route, his employer elected to exercise this right of transfer, unless the employee objected by a specified deadline under Regulation 4(9). Given the options to transfer, resign or object, Mr. De Marchi objected to his transfer and requested redundancy, as the new depot was over an hour from his domicile. As this was not one of the three alternatives, LUB rejected his approach, and Mr. De Marchi took a leave of absence suffering from stress and anxiety as he had been informed that, if he failed to sign a new contract by the deadline, his employment would effectively be terminated.

Mr. De Marchi failed to respond and later brought a claim for unfair dismissal against the transferor. The tribunal found that, while the employee may object to becoming employed by the transferor under Regulation 4(7) of TUPE, the effect of that objection is to preclude the transfer of his contract and any of the rights and obligations under Regulation 4(2) of TUPE.  However,  Regulation 4(8) TUPE operates to terminate the contract with the transferor to the detriment of the employee.

This ruling serves to provide useful guidance in terms of who is liable. If the objection occurs before the transfer, then the liability falls on the transferor. However, if the employee does not object to the transfer in a timely fashion and then tries to argue Regulation 4(9), then the liability falls on the transferee. It is thus advisable to seek legal advice before transferring employees to other positions or locations.

Roll-out of new digital markets regime

The UK's Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) has initiated its new digital markets competition regime, effective from January 1, 2025, following the Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Act's Royal Assent in May 2024.

Strategic Market Status (SMS) Designations

Under this regime, the CMA can designate firms with "Strategic Market Status" (SMS) concerning specific digital activities. This designation applies to companies with substantial and entrenched market power, allowing the CMA to impose conduct requirements or introduce pro-competition interventions to enhance outcomes for UK consumers and businesses.

Upcoming Investigations

The CMA plans to launch SMS designation investigations in three digital activity areas within the first six months of 2025. The initial two investigations are scheduled to commence in January, with details forthcoming later this month. A third investigation is anticipated towards the end of this period, allowing the CMA to manage resources efficiently and minimize stakeholder burden. Each investigation has a statutory completion timeline of nine months.

Commitment to Fair Competition

Sarah Cardell, Chief Executive of the CMA, emphasized the regime's role in balancing investment and innovation benefits from large digital firms with ensuring a level playing field for UK tech start-ups and scale-ups. The regime aims to foster more innovation, choice, and competitive pricing for UK businesses and consumers.

Guidance and Stakeholder Engagement

The CMA has published guidance detailing its approach to the new regime, including an 'explainer' guide for businesses, advisors, and stakeholders. This initiative underscores the CMA's commitment to transparency, proportionality, and predictability in enforcing the new regulations.

International Context

The UK's approach aligns with global trends in regulating digital markets. For instance, the European Union's Digital Markets Act enforces similar regulations to ensure fair competition among digital platforms.

The CMA's proactive measures reflect a commitment to fostering a competitive digital economy, ensuring that dominant market players do not stifle innovation or consumer choice. As the regime unfolds, its impact on the digital marketplace will become more evident, with the potential to set precedents for digital market regulation globally.

Ticket touts’ days are numbered

The UK government has unveiled a series of proposals aimed at curbing exploitative practices in the ticket resale market, seeking to protect consumers from exorbitant prices and enhance transparency in ticket sales.

Key Proposals:

  • Capping Resale Prices: The government is considering implementing a cap on ticket resale prices, potentially limiting them to the original face value or allowing a maximum increase of up to 30%. This initiative aims to prevent professional touts from purchasing large quantities of tickets and reselling them at significantly inflated prices, a practice that has frustrated fans and hindered fair access to events.
  • Limiting Ticket Quantities for Resale: To further deter large-scale touting, there is a proposal to restrict the number of tickets an individual can list for resale to the maximum number permitted per purchase in the primary market. This measure seeks to prevent organized groups from monopolizing ticket availability and profiting unfairly.
  • Enhancing Accountability of Resale Platforms: The government plans to introduce stricter regulations for ticket resale websites and applications, ensuring they provide accurate information regarding ticket prices and availability. This move is intended to increase transparency and protect consumers from misleading practices.
  • Stricter Penalties and Licensing Requirements: The proposals include the possibility of imposing tougher fines and establishing a licensing regime for resale platforms that violate ticketing rules. Currently, penalties for such breaches are limited, and the government aims to introduce more stringent consequences to deter malpractice.

These measures are part of a broader effort to address concerns raised by consumers and industry stakeholders about unfair practices in the ticketing market. The Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) has previously highlighted issues such as significant mark-ups on secondary ticket sales, with some tickets being resold for up to six times their original price. Research indicates that such practices cost music fans an estimated £145 million annually.