Author: Glenn

The UK government has recently addressed the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman's (PHSO) report concerning the communication of changes to women's State Pension age. The PHSO identified maladministration by the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) due to a 28-month delay in informing women born in the 1950s about these changes. In response, the government has acknowledged this finding and issued an apology.

PHSO Investigation Findings

The PHSO's investigation focused on how the DWP communicated these changes, not the policy decisions themselves. The findings were:

• 1995 to 2004: The DWP provided adequate and accurate information through various channels, including leaflets, campaigns, and its website.
• 2005 to 2007: Decision-making during this period led to a 28-month delay in sending personalized letters to affected women, which the PHSO deemed maladministration.
• Impact: While the delay constituted maladministration, the PHSO concluded it did not cause direct financial loss. However, it acknowledged that some women lost opportunities to make informed financial decisions, diminishing their sense of autonomy and control.

Government's Response

Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall accepted the finding of maladministration and issued an apology for the delay in communication. She emphasized the government's commitment to learning from this case to prevent similar issues in the future.

Despite acknowledging the communication failures, the government has decided against providing financial compensation. This decision is based on evidence suggesting that unsolicited letters are often ineffective; research indicates that only one in four people recall receiving unexpected letters. Additionally, the government argues that the majority of 1950s-born women were aware of the impending changes, and earlier communication would not have significantly altered this awareness.

The government also considered the financial implications of compensation. Proposals for a flat-rate compensation scheme, with payments ranging from £1,000 to £2,950 per individual, were estimated to cost between £3.5 billion and £10.5 billion. Given the belief that most women were already aware of the changes, the government deemed such expenditure an unjustifiable use of taxpayer funds.

Reactions and Implications

The decision not to offer compensation has been met with criticism from advocacy groups, particularly the Women Against State Pension Inequality (WASPI) campaign. They argue that inadequate communication left many women unprepared for the changes, leading to financial hardship. The government's stance has also sparked debate among policymakers and the public about the adequacy of communication strategies and the responsibility of the state in ensuring citizens are well-informed about significant policy changes.

Conclusion

While the government has acknowledged and apologized for the delays in communicating changes to the State Pension age for women born in the 1950s, it has decided against offering financial compensation. This decision is based on evidence suggesting that earlier communication may not have significantly increased awareness and concerns about the proportionality of compensation costs. The situation underscores the importance of effective communication in policy implementation and has prompted discussions about how to better inform the public about significant changes that impact their financial planning and well-being.

The economic outlook for the UK in 2025 presents a mixed picture, with expectations of modest growth tempered by persistent inflationary pressures.

Growth Projections

The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) has revised its forecast for UK economic growth in 2025 upward to 1.7%, citing increased government spending as a key driver.

This adjustment reflects the UK's resilience amid global economic uncertainties and aligns with its broader strategy to stimulate growth through fiscal policies and structural reforms.

Inflation Concerns

Despite the positive growth outlook, inflation remains a significant concern. The OECD projects that UK inflation will average 2.7% in 2025, the highest among G7 nations. This is attributed to strong wage growth and elevated services inflation, indicating persistent domestic price pressures.

Monetary Policy

In response to these dynamics, the Bank of England (BoE) has begun adjusting its monetary policy. In November 2024, the BoE reduced its interest rate from 5% to 4.75%, marking the second cut since 2020. However, the BoE has signalled that future rate reductions will be gradual, given the rising inflation expectations.

Analysts anticipate that the BoE will continue to lower rates cautiously throughout 2025, potentially reaching 3.75% by year-end.

Fiscal Policy and Public Debt

The UK's fiscal policy is poised to play a pivotal role in shaping the economic landscape. The March 2024 budget introduced measures aimed at stimulating growth, including increased public spending and tax adjustments. However, these initiatives have raised concerns about fiscal sustainability, with public debt projected to rise to 92.8% of GDP in 2025.

The OECD warns that the UK's stretched public finances may limit its capacity to address potential economic shocks in the future.

Labour Market and Business Sentiment

The labour market is expected to experience moderate improvements, with businesses expressing cautious optimism. Surveys indicate that a significant proportion of firms anticipate revenue growth and increased hiring in 2025, supporting the government's efforts to revive economic growth.

However, challenges such as rising national insurance contributions and persistent inflation may temper this optimism.

Conclusion

In summary, the UK's economic outlook for 2025 suggests a period of modest growth accompanied by persistent inflationary pressures. The interplay between fiscal stimulus and monetary policy adjustments will be crucial in navigating these challenges. While increased government spending may bolster economic activity, concerns about inflation and public debt sustainability remain pertinent. Stakeholders, including policymakers and businesses, will need to balance these factors to foster a stable and sustainable economic environment in the coming year.

Ensure compliance with HMRC rules when providing company cars. From P46(Car) submissions to benefit reporting, learn what steps to take for private use and specific exemptions.

Here are the steps you need to follow to inform HMRC if you make any cars available for private use by company directors or employees. Private use of a car includes employees’ journeys between home and work, unless they are traveling to a temporary work location.

You must submit a P46 (Car) form to HMRC if you:

• Provide company cars to employees
• Stop providing a company car
• Provide an additional car to someone

You can submit the form in the following ways:

• Complete it online and send a printed copy to the address listed on the form.
• Use HMRC’s PAYE Online service for employers.
• Use your payroll software.

Additionally, you must report the car benefit on your end-of-year forms and pay Class 1A National Insurance on its value. You must also notify HMRC if a company car is replaced.

You do not need to notify HMRC if you provide:

• 'Pool' cars, which are used by multiple employees for business purposes and usually kept on your premises.
• Cars adapted for employees with disabilities, if the only private use is for commuting.
• Emergency vehicles used exclusively by on-call employees in police, fire and rescue, ambulance, or paramedic services.

Navigating VAT in the construction industry can feel like untangling scaffolding. Enter the VAT reverse charge—special rules that mean sub-contractors no longer charge VAT on services but contractors handle the tax instead. Here's how it works and who it affects.

There are special VAT reverse charge rules that can apply to certain construction businesses. When these rules apply, the supply of most construction services between construction or building businesses is subject to the domestic reverse charge. The reverse charge only applies to supplies of specified construction services to other businesses in the construction sector.

The charge applies to standard and reduced rate VAT services:

• for businesses who are registered for VAT in the UK; and that are
• reported within the Construction Industry Scheme.

This means that where the rules apply, sub-contractors no longer add VAT to their supplies to most building customers, instead, contractors are obliged to pay the deemed output VAT on behalf of their registered sub-contractor suppliers. However, the deemed output tax is also available as a deduction from VAT paid if it qualifies as input VAT according to the usual rules. In which case there is no cash flow penalty for contractors. 

The VAT domestic reverse charge applies to the following services:

• constructing, altering, repairing, extending, demolishing or dismantling buildings or structures (whether permanent or not), including offshore installation services;
• constructing, altering, repairing, extending, demolishing of any works forming, or planned to form, part of the land, including (in particular) walls, roadworks, power lines, electronic communications equipment, aircraft runways, railways, inland waterways, docks and harbours, pipelines, reservoirs, water mains, wells, sewers, industrial plant and installations for purposes of land drainage, coast protection or defence;
• installing heating, lighting, air-conditioning, ventilation, power supply, drainage, sanitation, water supply or fire protection systems in any building or structure;
• internal cleaning of buildings and structures, so far as carried out in the course of their construction, alteration, repair, extension or restoration;
• painting or decorating the inside or the external surfaces of any building or structure; and
• services which form an integral part of or are part of the preparation or completion of the services, including site clearance, earth-moving, excavation, tunnelling and boring, laying of foundations, erection of scaffolding, site restoration, landscaping and the provision of roadways and other access works.

For companies selling shares, the Substantial Shareholdings Exemption (SSE) can mean significant tax relief. Introduced in 2002 and simplified in 2017, this exemption allows qualifying gains on share disposals to go untaxed—provided key conditions are met.

The SSE regime provides that a gain on a disposal by a company of shares (or an interest in shares, or certain assets related to shares) will not normally be a chargeable gain. This is provided the following two conditions are met for disposals on or after 1 April 2017. 

1. The ‘investing company’ must have held shares in the ‘investee company’ in such number, and for such time, that the shareholding satisfies ‘the substantial shareholding requirement’.
2. The ‘investee company requirement’ must meet similar ‘trading’ conditions. An exception to this condition was introduced for investments held through an investor company which is itself owned by qualifying institutional investors (“QIIs”). Where 25% or more of the Ordinary Share Capital of the company holding the shares being disposed of is owned by QIIs, the investee company requirement does not apply to the disposal, leaving only the substantial shareholding requirement. 

However, the exemption does not apply if:

• the disposal is a no gain/no loss disposal, or
• the gain would not have been a chargeable gain because of some other provision, or
• the gain arises to an insurance company on a certain type of deemed disposal, or
• should an anti-avoidance rule apply.

No formal claim is needed. If the conditions for the relief are met, the gain is automatically exempt. However, a loss on a disposal where the conditions for the relief are met is not an allowable loss.