Author: Glenn

Properties needing repairs still count as homes and false claims to recover Stamp Duty Land Tax could mean big tax bills and penalties.

HMRC has issued a warning to homebuyers about rogue tax agents promoting false Stamp Duty Land Tax (SDLT) repayment claims, especially those based on the condition of properties. Following a recent Court of Appeal decision, it has been confirmed that properties requiring repairs remain liable for residential rates of SDLT if they retain the fundamental characteristics of a dwelling. This applies even if the properties are temporarily uninhabitable.

Some agents exploit this by misleading buyers into believing they can reclaim SDLT by arguing the property is “non-residential.” These agents often charge hefty fees and leave homeowners liable for repayment of the tax, penalties, and interest.

HMRC’s press release on the matter provides an illustrative example of a person who bought a house in London for £1,100,000 with his solicitor filing the SDLT return and SDLT being calculated at the residential rates (£53,750). The home required some modernisation and repair.

The homebuyer was then targeted by a repayment agent who claimed he could recover £9,250 in SDLT due to property repairs. The agent took a 30% fee, and the homebuyer received £6,475. Later, HMRC carried out a compliance check and found the property was residential all along. This meant that the homebuyer was left owing the full £9,250, plus interest and penalties, with the agent refusing to assist.

The case reinforces that a property’s poor condition does not alter its classification as a dwelling if it is structurally sound and previously used as a home. SDLT claims that are invalid can result in serious financial consequences for the buyer, who is ultimately responsible for the accuracy of any SDLT repayment submission.

We would be happy to help you consider where you are eligible to make a claim without incurring unnecessary fees or risks.

Fit and proper test fee to jump from £150 to £700 under HMRC’s proposed AML supervision changes

Many businesses are monitored by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) or certain professional bodies for Anti-Money Laundering (AML) purposes. However, HMRC is responsible for supervising more than 36,000 businesses in 9 business sectors. There are registration and annual fees that are charged for anti-money laundering supervision by HMRC. These fees have remained the same since May 2019, and HMRC is currently looking to increase the fees that they charge within the current fee structure to meet the costs of providing effective AML supervision.

HMRC plans to increase the premises fee from £300 to £400, representing a 33% increase since 2019. The reduced rate for small businesses will also increase from £180 to £200. Most affected businesses operate from a single premises.

The approvals fee, which ensures responsible individuals (BOOMs) are suitable for their roles, will remain unchanged at £40. However, the fit and proper (F&P) test fee, which applies to MSBs and TCSPs due to their higher risk profiles, will significantly rise from £150 to £700.

HMRC also plans to reintroduce an application fee of £400 for businesses newly registering or reapplying due to lapsed registration. Finally, the sanctions administration charge will be revised. While previously tied to the type of penalty, HMRC proposes a flat £2,000 charge for all types of sanctions, capped at the value of the penalty. A separate lower charge of £350 will still apply for specific regulatory failures.

These changes are open for comment until 29 August 2025, and it is expected that further information on when these new charges will be introduced will follow shortly afterwards.

The Bank of England has knocked the main interest rate down to 4% today, cutting it by a quarter‑point from 4.25%. It’s the fifth cut in a year and brings the rate to its lowest since March 2023.

The decision was a close call: the nine‑member Monetary Policy Committee split 5‑4, requiring an unusual second round of voting to reach agreement. Bank governor Andrew Bailey cautioned that future cuts will have to be gradual and careful, especially given expectations that inflation may still hit 4% by September.

This cut offers relief to homeowners with tracker‑rate mortgages, reducing monthly repayments, but savers are likely to see lower returns on easy‑access accounts.

If your property has changed or seems mis-banded, you may have the right to request a Council Tax review.

Properties in England and Wales are assigned Council Tax bands based on their value as of 1 April 1991 (England) or 1 April 2003 (Wales). If you believe your property is incorrectly banded, you may challenge this through the Valuation Office Agency (VOA).

You have a legal right (known as ‘making a proposal’) to challenge if:

• You have paid Council Tax for less than 6 months.
• The VOA changed your band in the last 6 months.
• Your property or local area has undergone significant change (e.g. structural alterations, change of use, or redevelopment).

If you don’t have a legal right, you may still request a band review by submitting evidence such as:

• Sale prices of similar properties around the valuation date.
• Up to five comparable properties in lower bands, matching on type, size, age, and location.

Challenges can be made online, by form, phone, or email. Council Tax payments must continue during the review. VOA decisions may take up to 6 months (legal right) or 12 months (band review). Appeals are permitted only where a legal challenge was made.

If you live in Scotland, then you need to use the Scottish Assessors portal website to check your Council Tax band and if necessary, lodge a claim with them (known as a proposal).

Many small business owners turn to family members when looking to fill roles in their team. It can seem like a natural choice, offering trust, loyalty, and a shared sense of purpose. However, employing family in your business is not without its challenges, and it is worth considering the potential pitfalls before making that commitment.

One of the main risks is a lack of objectivity. Family relationships can cloud judgement when it comes to performance, discipline, or promotion. It may be harder to have honest conversations about underperformance or to apply the same standards as you would to non-family staff. This can lead to resentment among other team members and undermine morale.

There is also the risk of blurred boundaries. If work disagreements spill into personal life, or vice versa, it can strain family relationships. When personal loyalty and business interests conflict, it can create tension that affects both the family and the business.

Tax and payroll rules must also be followed carefully. HMRC requires that family members employed in a business must be paid a commercial rate for actual work done, and they must be treated in line with employment laws. Inflated pay, unclear job roles, or token positions can lead to problems with tax compliance and potentially trigger enquiries.

Succession planning can also become difficult. If some family members are involved and others are not, questions may arise about ownership, leadership, or fairness in the long term. This can be particularly sensitive when passing the business to the next generation.

In short, employing family can work well when there is clear structure, professional standards, and open communication. But it is essential to treat family members like any other employee, with roles, responsibilities, and expectations clearly defined from the start.