Author: Glenn

The way we meet has changed dramatically in recent years. Technology now makes it possible to discuss projects, close deals and hold team meetings without ever leaving our desks. Yet for many, there is still something powerful about sitting across the table from another person. Both formats have their place, and the right choice often depends on purpose, people and context.

Online meetings are efficient. They remove the need for travel, save time and allow busy people to meet at short notice. For businesses with remote staff or clients across the country, video calls make communication easy and inexpensive. Online platforms also allow for screen sharing, document collaboration, and recording, all of which can make discussions more productive.

However, virtual meetings can have drawbacks. Technical glitches, weak connections and background distractions can interrupt the flow. It can also be harder to read body language or sense engagement, especially in larger groups. Without informal conversation before or after a meeting, relationships can feel more functional than personal.

Meeting in person allows for a deeper level of connection. Subtle cues, tone, and eye contact help build trust and understanding, especially when sensitive or complex matters are involved. Negotiations, strategic planning and first introductions often benefit from a personal touch. The act of meeting physically can also signal commitment and importance.

The disadvantages are mainly practical. Face-to-face meetings take more time and often involve travel costs. Coordinating diaries can be difficult and the environmental impact of regular travel is increasingly questioned.

For most businesses, a mix works best. Routine updates and quick check-ins are well suited to online meetings, while major decisions, negotiations, or relationship-building sessions still benefit from being held in person. The key is to choose the setting that best supports the outcome you want to achieve.

If your income exceeds £60,000 and you or your partner receive Child Benefit, you can now choose to pay the High Income Child Benefit Charge through your PAYE code instead of filing a Self-Assessment return; a simpler way to stay compliant while keeping your Child Benefit claim active.

The High Income Child Benefit Charge (HICBC) is a charge that applies to parents whose income exceeds £60,000 in a tax year and whose family receive Child Benefit. The charge is calculated at a rate of 1% of the full Child Benefit amount for every £200 of income between £60,000 and £80,000. Once income exceeds £80,000, the charge equals the full amount of Child Benefit received effectively removing any financial gain from claiming it.

Taxpayers now have the option to report their Child Benefit payments and pay the HICBC directly through their PAYE tax code, rather than filing a Self-Assessment tax return. This change was announced in the Autumn Statement 2024 and has recently been made available to eligible taxpayers.

The tax charge can be collected through PAYE if:

• the individual is not required to file a self-assessment tax return for any other reason (for example, if they are self-employed), and
• the payment arrangement is made before 31 January following the end of the relevant tax year.

If these conditions are not met, the HICBC must be paid through self-assessment instead.

Taxpayers can choose whether to continue receiving Child Benefit and pay the charge or opt out of receiving it to avoid the charge altogether. It is usually beneficial to claim Child Benefit as doing so can safeguard certain benefits and ensure your child receives a National Insurance number at age 16.

When a couple is separating or undergoing divorce proceedings, tax issues are often not the first thing on their minds. However, alongside the emotional challenges, it is important to understand the tax implications of divorce can have a significant impact.

Changes to the Capital Gains Tax (CGT) rules for divorcing couples took effect on 6 April 2023. These changes extended the period during which spouses and civil partners can make transfers between each other without triggering CGT. The no gain/no loss rule now lasts up to three years after they stop living together. Additionally, if the couple has a formal divorce agreement, there is no time limit for these transfers. Before this change, the no gain/no loss treatment only applied to disposals in the tax year of the separation.

There are also specific rules for people who continue to have a financial interest in their former family home after separating. These rules allow them to claim private residence relief (PRR) when the home is eventually sold, provided certain conditions are met.

During divorce proceedings, it is crucial to reach a fair financial agreement, if possible, as this can help avoid further legal complications. If an agreement cannot be reached, the court may step in to issue a "financial order." Both parties and their advisers should also carefully consider the future of the family home, any family businesses, and the potential Inheritance Tax consequences of the separation or divorce.

Certain buildings, land, works of art, and other objects of national significance may be exempt from Inheritance Tax and Capital Gains Tax (CGT) when they are transferred to a new owner. This exemption applies under a special tax relief for national heritage assets that are either gifted or bequeathed.

To qualify for this relief, the asset must meet at least one of the following criteria:

• Buildings, estates or parklands of outstanding historical or architectural interest
• Land of outstanding natural beauty and spectacular views
• Land of outstanding scientific interest including special areas for the conservation of wildlife, plants and trees
• Objects with national scientific, historic or artistic interest, either in their own right or due to a connection with historical buildings

Upon transfer of ownership, the new owner is required to enter into a formal agreement, known as ‘the undertakings. This agreement ensures that the asset will be cared for, made available for public viewing, and retained in the UK. Failure to meet these conditions, or selling the asset, results in the revocation of the tax exemption under the Conditional Exemption Tax Incentive scheme. As a consequence, the asset would then be subject to tax in accordance with the standard rules.

HMRC is guided by the government’s heritage advisory agencies in deciding which assets qualify for exemption.

Married couples and civil partners could save up to £252 a year by transferring part of one partner’s unused personal allowance to the other, but you may need to cancel the claim if your income or relationship status changes.

The Marriage Allowance applies to married couples and civil partners where one partner does not pay tax or does not pay tax above the basic rate threshold for Income Tax (i.e., one partner must earn less than the £12,570 personal allowance for 2025-26).

The allowance allows the lower-earning partner to transfer up to £1,260 of their unused personal tax-free allowance to their spouse or civil partner. The transfer can only be made if the recipient (the higher-earning partner) is taxed at the basic 20% rate, which typically means they have an income between £12,571 and £50,270. For those living in Scotland, this would usually apply to an income between £12,571 and £43,662.

By using the allowance, the lower-earning partner can transfer up to £1,260 of their unused personal allowance, which could result in an annual tax saving of up to £252 for the recipient (20% of £1,260).

However, it is important to be aware you must cancel the Marriage Allowance if your circumstances change and any of the following apply:

• your relationship ends – because you have divorced, ended (‘dissolved’) your civil partnership or legally separated;
• your income changes and you are no longer eligible; or
• you no longer want to claim.