Author: Glenn

Have you set up a suggestion scheme for ideas that could save or earn you money? Employee suggestion schemes can offer up to £5,000 tax-free for valuable input — and even £25 for smaller efforts. A win for innovation and your employee payslip!

An employee suggestion scheme can offer many advantages for businesses, not only in terms of the valuable insights and innovations employees contribute but also through the potential for significant tax-free rewards. These schemes can help businesses save money, drive new business, and foster a culture of continuous improvement, all the while offering employees incentives for their contributions.

HMRC outlines two types of awards that businesses can offer employees under such schemes:

1. Encouragement Awards – These are given for good suggestions or to reward employees for special efforts. Encouragement awards are exempt from both tax and National Insurance contributions up to a limit of £25. Any amount paid above £25 will need to be processed through the payroll and taxed accordingly.
2. Financial Benefit Awards – These are offered for suggestions that have the potential to save or generate money for the business. The financial benefit awards are exempt from tax up to a generous cap of £5,000. The exempt amount is determined by the greater of:
   • 50% of the money you expect the suggestion to save or generate for your business in the year following its implementation.
   • 10% of the money you expect the suggestion to save or generate for your business over the first five years after its implementation.

In addition to these conditions, there are other reasonable criteria that must be met for the payments to be considered tax-free. These criteria are designed to ensure that the awards are made in a structured and transparent manner.

The UK’s Business and Trade Secretary, Jonathan Reynolds, has set out the government's position following the United States' recent imposition of new tariffs on UK exports. These include a 10% reciprocal tariff on British goods and a separate 25% global tariff on cars — moves that have prompted concern among UK manufacturers and exporters.

Reynolds told Parliament he was disappointed by the decision, particularly given the close trading relationship between the two countries. While the US has already imposed a 25% tariff on steel, aluminium, and related products since March, the latest action extends the economic pressure and signals a hardening stance from Washington.

Despite the setback, the Trade Secretary struck a calm and constructive tone, saying the UK will continue to act in the national interest while standing behind domestic industries. He confirmed that UK officials are in ongoing talks with key figures in the US administration, including the Secretary of Commerce and the US Trade Representative, in an effort to rebuild a more stable and mutually beneficial trading relationship.

Reynolds was clear that the government is not seeking to inflame tensions but is preparing for all eventualities. A new public consultation has been launched, inviting businesses and stakeholders to give their views on the impact of the tariffs and to suggest potential UK responses. The consultation runs until 1 May and aims to ensure that any future action is well-informed and proportionate.

The government has also committed to helping businesses navigate the situation, offering guidance through its trade support services and encouraging firms to share their concerns. Reynolds noted that many UK companies still see strong opportunities in US-UK trade and want to preserve access to the world’s largest economy.

He ended by affirming the government’s wider strategy to promote economic resilience through industrial growth, international cooperation, and fair trading practices. The message from the Department for Business and Trade is that while the tariffs are unwelcome, the UK remains focused on protecting its interests without resorting to knee-jerk reactions.

In short, the UK is taking a pragmatic, level-headed approach — defending its industries, listening to businesses, and working to keep trade channels open, even in challenging circumstances.

The UK government has announced a record-breaking £13.9 billion in research and development (R&D) funding for the coming year. This major investment is designed to drive innovation, create quality jobs, and support long-term economic growth across the country.

A large share of the funding, amounting to £8.8 billion, has been allocated to UK Research and Innovation (UKRI), which supports the UK’s leading scientific and technological projects. This funding will help deliver groundbreaking work across multiple sectors including life sciences, clean energy, and advanced engineering.

One of the headline projects includes research into new blood tests aimed at detecting dementia earlier. With nearly a million people in the UK affected by the condition, early diagnosis could make a big difference to treatment outcomes and overall quality of life. It would also help reduce pressure on health and care services.

Another key area of investment is renewable energy. The government is continuing its support for the construction of a new wind turbine test facility in Blyth, Northumberland. This project, which is receiving £86 million, is expected to boost the UK's capacity for clean energy development, support highly skilled local employment, and attract further private investment into the green economy.

The government sees this R&D investment as a central part of its broader 'Plan for Change', which aims to strengthen public services while encouraging economic opportunity and innovation. Officials believe that public investment in R&D often leads to a doubling of private sector investment over time. Evidence shows that businesses receiving R&D grant funding often experience more than 20 percent growth in both employment and turnover within six years.

Science and Technology Secretary Peter Kyle described the investment as a commitment to the future. He said innovation is central to solving society’s biggest challenges, from life-saving medical advances to tackling climate change. He also stressed that research and development plays a vital role in growing the economy and supporting public services across the UK.

This unprecedented level of funding shows that the UK is serious about its role as a global leader in science and technology. By supporting bold ideas and giving researchers the tools they need, the government hopes to unlock progress, create opportunity, and deliver real benefits for people and businesses throughout the country.

1 May 2025 – Due date for corporation tax due for the year ended 30 July 2024.

19 May 2025 – PAYE and NIC deductions due for month ended 5 May 2025. (If you pay your tax electronically the due date is 22 May 2025).

19 May 2025 – Filing deadline for the CIS300 monthly return for the month ended 5 May 2025.

19 May 2025 – CIS tax deducted for the month ended 5 May 2025 is payable by today.

31 May 2025 – Ensure all employees have been given their P60s for the 2024/25 tax year.

1 June 2025 – Due date for corporation tax due for the year ended 31 August 2024.

19 June 2025 – PAYE and NIC deductions due for month ended 5 June 2025. (If you pay your tax electronically the due date is 22 June 2025).

19 June 2025 – Filing deadline for the CIS300 monthly return for the month ended 5 June 2025.

19 June 2025 – CIS tax deducted for the month ended 5 June 2025 is payable by today.

Kau Media Group (KMG) Ltd. sought to enforce two post-termination employment restriction (PTRs) contained in a contract of employment to restrict Mr. Hart, a former employee, from working for his proposed new employer, MiSmile Media Ltd. (MML).

Mr. Hart had worked for KMG from November 2020 to late 2024 as an Account Director. From 2021, the defendant became Account Director for MML, a longstanding client of KMG. On the 19th of September 2024, Mr. Hart informed Mr. Khokhar of KMG that he had since taken a job at MML despite being offered more favourable terms, having been approached by the CEO of MML. Mr. Khokhar however made it clear that taking such a job was against the terms of Mr. Hart’s contract.

On the 25th of September 2024, Mr. Hart inaccurately told the claimant he had already signed a contract with MML, before proceedings were started on the 13th of December 2024. The High Court however concluded that KMG did not establish that the PTRs were enforceable with respect to confidentiality and refused the application for injunctive relief on the grounds of ‘restraint of trade’.

The onus was on KMG to demonstrate that the PTRs were reasonable, protected its legitimate business interests, and that any restrictions were commensurate with the benefits secured under the contract. Even though the services provided by MML and KMG were overtly identical, making them potential competitors, the work involved did not comprise a core part of KMG’s dental sector business and thus MML was not effectively in direct competition with KMG. Settled case law has established that legitimate interest does not cover “the skill, experience, know-how, and general knowledge" acquired by an employee, in order to rely on this interest, KMG should have demonstrated ‘objective’ knowledge.

Thus, before incorporating or seeking to enforce any PTRs, ensure that any PTR relied upon is reasonable between the parties, protects the company’s legitimate business interests, and does not venture beyond these demarcations, or else the PTR may be rendered void and unenforceable.