Author: Glenn

The UK’s Business and Trade Secretary, Jonathan Reynolds, has set out the government's position following the United States' recent imposition of new tariffs on UK exports. These include a 10% reciprocal tariff on British goods and a separate 25% global tariff on cars — moves that have prompted concern among UK manufacturers and exporters.

Reynolds told Parliament he was disappointed by the decision, particularly given the close trading relationship between the two countries. While the US has already imposed a 25% tariff on steel, aluminium, and related products since March, the latest action extends the economic pressure and signals a hardening stance from Washington.

Despite the setback, the Trade Secretary struck a calm and constructive tone, saying the UK will continue to act in the national interest while standing behind domestic industries. He confirmed that UK officials are in ongoing talks with key figures in the US administration, including the Secretary of Commerce and the US Trade Representative, in an effort to rebuild a more stable and mutually beneficial trading relationship.

Reynolds was clear that the government is not seeking to inflame tensions but is preparing for all eventualities. A new public consultation has been launched, inviting businesses and stakeholders to give their views on the impact of the tariffs and to suggest potential UK responses. The consultation runs until 1 May and aims to ensure that any future action is well-informed and proportionate.

The government has also committed to helping businesses navigate the situation, offering guidance through its trade support services and encouraging firms to share their concerns. Reynolds noted that many UK companies still see strong opportunities in US-UK trade and want to preserve access to the world’s largest economy.

He ended by affirming the government’s wider strategy to promote economic resilience through industrial growth, international cooperation, and fair trading practices. The message from the Department for Business and Trade is that while the tariffs are unwelcome, the UK remains focused on protecting its interests without resorting to knee-jerk reactions.

In short, the UK is taking a pragmatic, level-headed approach — defending its industries, listening to businesses, and working to keep trade channels open, even in challenging circumstances.

Child Benefit has risen for 2025–26: £26.05 for eldest, £17.25 for others. Claim continues to age 20 in approved education. HICBC still applies for incomes over £60K – but PAYE option coming this summer!

The child benefit rates for the only or eldest child in a family increased to £26.05 (from £25.60) for the 2025-26 tax year and the weekly rate for all other children to £17.25 (from £16.95). Child Benefit is usually paid every 4 weeks and will automatically be paid into a bank account. There is no limit to how many children parents can claim for.

Taxpayers entitled to the child benefit should be aware that HMRC usually stop paying child benefit on the 31 August following a child’s 16th Birthday. Under qualifying circumstances, the child benefit payment can continue until a child reaches their 20th birthday if they stay in approved education or training. A qualifying young person is someone aged 16,17, 18 or 19 in full time non-advanced education or in approved training.

Any parents with children that remain in approved education or training should contact the child benefit office to ensure they continue receiving the child benefit payments to which they are entitled. No child benefit is payable after a young person reaches the age of 20 years.

Child benefit is usually payable for children who come to the UK. However, there are a number of rules which must be met in order to claim. HMRC must be notified without delay if a child receiving child benefit moves permanently abroad.

The High Income Child Benefit Charge (HICBC) currently applies to taxpayers whose income exceeds £60,000 in a tax year and who are in receipt of child benefit. The HICBC is charged at the rate of 1% of the full child benefit award for each £200 of income between £60,000 and £80,000. For taxpayers with income above £80,000 the amount of the charge will equal the amount of child benefit received.

The HICBC therefore either reduces or removes the financial benefit of receiving child benefit. It was announced as part of the Spring Statement measures that from this summer, families will have the option to report their Child Benefit payments and pay the HICBC directly through their PAYE tax code instead of filing a self-assessment tax return.

From April 2025, updated ATED rates apply to residential properties held by companies and other Non-Natural Persons (NNPs). Make sure returns and payments are submitted by 30 April to avoid penalties. Reliefs may apply for commercial use.

The Annual Tax on Enveloped Dwellings (ATED) applies to NNPs who own interests in residential properties valued over £500,000. These provisions specifically affect entities such as companies, partnerships with company members, and managers of collective investment schemes, which are all classified as NNPs under the legislation.

Individuals who own property directly (rather than through a company) are not subject to ATED or ATED-related Capital Gains Tax (CGT). Furthermore, certain reliefs may be available if the property is used for commercial purposes.

Since 1 April 2025, ATED is charged based on the following property value bands:

For properties that were subject to ATED on 1 April 2025, both the return and payment must be submitted by 30 April 2025, covering the ATED period from 1 April 2025 to 31 March 2026. If a property is acquired after 1 April and falls within the scope of ATED, payment is due within 30 days of acquisition.

Penalties may be imposed for late filing, late payments, or inaccurate returns. Taxpayers have 30 days to appeal HMRC decisions, including penalties or determinations, by providing the grounds for the appeal.

Small gifts can mean big tax savings! Use the trivial benefits exemption in 2025–26 to reward employees with non-cash perks under £50 – no PAYE, no P11D, and no NIC. A smart, simple way to say thanks.

The rules providing trivial benefit payments provide a great opportunity to give small rewards and incentives to employees in the new 2025-26 tax year. The benefit-in-kind (BiK) trivial exemption applies to small non-cash benefits like a bottle of wine, or a bouquet of flowers given occasionally to employees or any other BiK classed as 'trivial' that falls within the exemption.

By taking advantage of the exemption employers can simplify the treatment of BiKs whilst at the same time offering a tax efficient way to give small gifts to employees. The employer also benefits as the trivial benefit payments do not have to be included on PAYE settlement agreements or disclosed on P11D forms. There is also a matching exemption from Class 1A National Insurance contributions.

The tax exemption applies to trivial BiKs where the BiK:

• is not cash or a cash-voucher; and
• costs £50 or less; and
• is not provided as part of a salary sacrifice or other contractual arrangement; and
• is not provided in recognition of services performed by the employee as part of their employment, or in anticipation of such services.

The rules also allow directors or other office-holders of close companies and their families to benefit from an annual cap of £300. The £50 limit remains for each gift but could allow for up to £300 of non-cash benefits to be withdrawn per director or shareholder per year. The £300 cap doesn’t apply to employees. If the £50 limit is exceeded for any gift, the full value of the benefit will be taxable.

Kau Media Group (KMG) Ltd. sought to enforce two post-termination employment restriction (PTRs) contained in a contract of employment to restrict Mr. Hart, a former employee, from working for his proposed new employer, MiSmile Media Ltd. (MML).

Mr. Hart had worked for KMG from November 2020 to late 2024 as an Account Director. From 2021, the defendant became Account Director for MML, a longstanding client of KMG. On the 19th of September 2024, Mr. Hart informed Mr. Khokhar of KMG that he had since taken a job at MML despite being offered more favourable terms, having been approached by the CEO of MML. Mr. Khokhar however made it clear that taking such a job was against the terms of Mr. Hart’s contract.

On the 25th of September 2024, Mr. Hart inaccurately told the claimant he had already signed a contract with MML, before proceedings were started on the 13th of December 2024. The High Court however concluded that KMG did not establish that the PTRs were enforceable with respect to confidentiality and refused the application for injunctive relief on the grounds of ‘restraint of trade’.

The onus was on KMG to demonstrate that the PTRs were reasonable, protected its legitimate business interests, and that any restrictions were commensurate with the benefits secured under the contract. Even though the services provided by MML and KMG were overtly identical, making them potential competitors, the work involved did not comprise a core part of KMG’s dental sector business and thus MML was not effectively in direct competition with KMG. Settled case law has established that legitimate interest does not cover “the skill, experience, know-how, and general knowledge" acquired by an employee, in order to rely on this interest, KMG should have demonstrated ‘objective’ knowledge.

Thus, before incorporating or seeking to enforce any PTRs, ensure that any PTR relied upon is reasonable between the parties, protects the company’s legitimate business interests, and does not venture beyond these demarcations, or else the PTR may be rendered void and unenforceable.