Author: Glenn

A Tribunal recently ruled that payments made for work into a third-party trust constitute immediate employment earnings. This decision effectively precludes employers from using loan-based structures to obfuscate remuneration.

Mr. Jack was employed by an offshore company based in the Isle of Man while living and working in the UK. Under this arrangement, the fees paid for Mr. Jack’s services were split into a modest basic salary and an employee benefit trust (EBT), which would then advance these funds to Mr. Jack in the form of interest-free loans. Because these payments were categorised as loans rather than salary, they were not initially reported as taxable employment income.

Following an enquiry into Mr. Jack’s self-assessment return, HMRC issued a closure notice concluding that the £48,034 transferred to the EBT actually constituted “redirected earnings” and was, therefore, taxable as employment income under Section 62 of the Income Tax (Earnings and Pensions) Act (ITEPA) 2003. Mr. Jack appealed, arguing that a significant portion of the funds should be exempt from tax since he had repaid approximately £23,479 of those loans in April 2011.

The Tribunal upheld HMRC’s closure notice and applied the Supreme Court’s decision in RFC 2012 plc. The Judge held that, when money was paid into the EBT for work done by Mr. Jack, it effectively became taxable employment income at that exact juncture as “redirected” earnings. Mr. Jack’s argument that he had “fixed” the tax issue by repaying the loans was also rejected, as the tax charge arose on the transfer to the EBT, and anything that happened to the money afterwards did not affect the tax already owed for the 2010/11 tax year.

This ruling confirms that the legal characterisation of a relationship or a payment in a contract is secondary to the reality of the work performed. Care must be taken when creating structures to minimise tax burden and maximise profits, as the full amount transferred to a trust could be seen as ‘earnings’. Based on the Rangers case, if money is paid in return for services, it constitutes remuneration. On the other side of the coin, if a court views a loan as salary, it may also come to view the recipient as a worker who is entitled to full statutory rights.

For many businesses, waste disposal is seen purely as a cost, an unavoidable expense required to stay compliant and keep operations running smoothly. However, there is growing interest in the idea that waste, when managed differently, can become a modest but meaningful source of income rather than a drain on resources.

The starting point is recognising that much commercial waste still has value. Materials such as metals, cardboard, plastics, glass, and certain by-products can often be separated and sold for recycling. While individual returns may appear small, the cumulative effect over a year can offset disposal costs and, in some cases, generate a surplus. This is particularly relevant for manufacturing, construction, hospitality, and retail businesses where waste volumes are high.

Technology and data are also playing a role. Improved tracking of waste streams allows businesses to understand what they are throwing away, how often, and at what cost. With this information, processes can be redesigned to reduce waste at source or to segregate materials more effectively. Cleaner, well-sorted waste commands higher prices and attracts a wider range of recycling partners.

Energy recovery offers another potential income stream. Organic waste can be converted into biogas through anaerobic digestion, while some non-recyclable materials can be used in waste-to-energy facilities. Although these solutions often require collaboration with specialist providers, they can reduce landfill charges and create long-term savings or revenue-sharing opportunities.

There is also a reputational benefit. Customers, investors, and supply chain partners are increasingly focused on sustainability. Businesses that can demonstrate circular practices may find it easier to win contracts, attract investment, or justify premium pricing.

Turning waste into income is unlikely to replace core trading profits. However, with careful planning and realistic expectations, it can reduce costs, support environmental goals, and create incremental value. In a tighter economic climate, even small efficiency gains can make a noticeable difference to overall business performance.

The term “silver economy” is used to describe the growing economic activity linked to an ageing population. In the UK and across much of the developed world, people are living longer, healthier lives. This demographic shift is reshaping consumer demand, labour markets, and public policy, and it is creating both challenges and opportunities for businesses.

By 2040, nearly one in four people in the UK is expected to be aged 65 or over. Unlike previous generations, many older adults have higher levels of wealth, remain active for longer, and expect products and services that support independence, wellbeing, and quality of life. This has driven growth in sectors such as healthcare, home adaptations, financial planning, leisure, and technology designed for ease of use rather than novelty.

Financial services are also evolving. As people spend more years in retirement, there is greater focus on retirement planning, later-life lending, equity release, and inheritance planning. Businesses that can offer clear, trusted advice in these areas are well placed to benefit.

Importantly, the silver economy is not just about consumption. Many older individuals continue to work, volunteer, or run businesses well beyond traditional retirement age. Flexible working, part-time roles, and consultancy work allow experience and skills to remain within the economy for longer.

For policymakers and businesses alike, the key challenge is to adapt. Those who recognise the diversity, spending power, and contribution of older generations will find that the silver economy is not a burden, but a significant and growing source of economic value.

Scotland’s Finance Secretary, Shona Robison delivered her third Budget statement to the Scottish parliament on 13 January 2026. This is the final Budget before the Holyrood elections due to take place in May.

There were no changes announced to the Scottish Income Tax rates. Following the UK Government’s extension of personal tax threshold freezes, the Higher, Advanced and Top rate thresholds will also remain unchanged until 2028–29. The Starter rate band is set to increase by 40.3% and the Basic rate band by 13.6% in 2026-27. This means that a larger portion of people's income will be taxed at the starter and basic rates helping to protect lower income households.

The Scottish rates and bands for 2026-27 are as follows:

The standard personal allowance remains frozen at £12,570. 

No changes were announced to the residential and non-residential rates and bands for the land and buildings transaction tax (LBTT). The standard rate of Scottish landfill tax will rise to £130.75 per tonne and the lower rate to £8.65 per tonne from April 2026 maintaining alignment with the corresponding taxes in the rest of the UK. It was also announced that new council tax bands will be introduced from April 2028 for residential properties valued at £1m more. The Budget measures are subject to final approval by the Scottish parliament.

It is recommended to check your National Insurance record as this can affect your future entitlement to the State Pension and other benefits.

By using the online service, you can see what National Insurance contributions you have paid up to the start of the current tax year, along with any National Insurance credits you have received. The record also highlights whether there are gaps in your contribution history. This will highlight tax years that do not count as qualifying years for State Pension purposes. These gaps can arise for a variety of reasons, such as periods of low earnings, time spent working abroad or career breaks.

The service also shows whether you are eligible to make voluntary National Insurance contributions to fill any missing years and how much this would cost. Importantly, it allows you to see how your State Pension forecast could change if you decide to make those additional contributions, helping you decide whether paying voluntarily contributions would be beneficial.