Author: Glenn

Struggling with unpaid invoices? If you've paid VAT to HMRC but never received payment from your customer, you may be able to reclaim that VAT. Learn how bad debt relief works and whether switching to cash accounting could ease your VAT woes.

The VAT bad debt relief provisions enable businesses to reclaim VAT that has been paid to HMRC when a customer fails to pay for goods or services within a reasonable period. This typically applies when an invoice has been issued, but payment has not been received for an extended period (usually six months after the due date).

Under standard VAT accounting procedures, businesses are required to account for VAT at the time an invoice is issued, regardless of whether payment has been received. However, businesses can claim bad debt relief if specific conditions are met.

The primary conditions for claiming bad debt relief, as outlined in HMRC’s guidance, include:

1. The VAT on the supply must have already been accounted for and paid to HMRC.
2. The debt must be written off in the business’s regular VAT accounts and transferred to a separate bad debt account.
3. The value of the supply must not exceed the usual selling price.
4. The debt should not have been paid, sold, or factored through a valid legal assignment.
5. The debt must remain unpaid for at least six months after the later of the payment due date or the supply date.

It is important to note that businesses using the cash accounting scheme, or those that use certain retail schemes, only account for VAT on the amounts they have actually received from customers. As such, businesses operating under these schemes are generally not required to make bad debt relief claims, as VAT is only paid once payment is received.

Small businesses experiencing significant issues with bad debts may find it beneficial to apply for the cash accounting scheme, as this can help mitigate VAT liabilities by deferring payment until the customer settles their debt.

Swapped an old fridge or carpet in your rental property? Landlords can claim tax relief on replacing domestic items – but not if it's an upgrade! Know the rules and save money by claiming what you are entitled.

The replacement of domestic items relief allows landlords to claim tax relief when they replace movable furniture, household appliances, and other domestic items in a rental property. This relief is available for various items, including free-standing wardrobes, carpets, curtains, televisions, fridges, and crockery.

The amount of the deduction depends on several factors:

• The cost of the new replacement item, which is limited to the cost of an equivalent item if it represents an improvement over the old one (i.e., beyond the reasonable modern equivalent); plus
• the incidental costs associated with disposing of the old item or acquiring the replacement; minus
• any amounts received from disposing of the old item must be deducted from the total claimable amount.

A key aspect of this relief is distinguishing between a "replacement" and an "improvement." If the new item is deemed an improvement over the old one, the allowable deduction is limited to the cost of purchasing an equivalent item of similar type and function.

HMRC’s internal guidance provides an example highlighting the fact that a brand-new budget washing machine costing circa £200 is not an improvement over a 5-year-old washing machine that cost around £200 at the time of purchase (or slightly less, considering inflation).

If the replacement item is a reasonable modern equivalent, such as replacing an old fridge with a new energy-efficient model, this would not be considered an improvement, and the landlord can claim the full cost of the new item under the relief.

This relief helps landlords offset the costs of maintaining and upgrading rental properties, provided the replacement is for an equivalent item rather than an enhanced or more expensive upgrade.

The UK government has announced a record-breaking £13.9 billion in research and development (R&D) funding for the coming year. This major investment is designed to drive innovation, create quality jobs, and support long-term economic growth across the country.

A large share of the funding, amounting to £8.8 billion, has been allocated to UK Research and Innovation (UKRI), which supports the UK’s leading scientific and technological projects. This funding will help deliver groundbreaking work across multiple sectors including life sciences, clean energy, and advanced engineering.

One of the headline projects includes research into new blood tests aimed at detecting dementia earlier. With nearly a million people in the UK affected by the condition, early diagnosis could make a big difference to treatment outcomes and overall quality of life. It would also help reduce pressure on health and care services.

Another key area of investment is renewable energy. The government is continuing its support for the construction of a new wind turbine test facility in Blyth, Northumberland. This project, which is receiving £86 million, is expected to boost the UK's capacity for clean energy development, support highly skilled local employment, and attract further private investment into the green economy.

The government sees this R&D investment as a central part of its broader 'Plan for Change', which aims to strengthen public services while encouraging economic opportunity and innovation. Officials believe that public investment in R&D often leads to a doubling of private sector investment over time. Evidence shows that businesses receiving R&D grant funding often experience more than 20 percent growth in both employment and turnover within six years.

Science and Technology Secretary Peter Kyle described the investment as a commitment to the future. He said innovation is central to solving society’s biggest challenges, from life-saving medical advances to tackling climate change. He also stressed that research and development plays a vital role in growing the economy and supporting public services across the UK.

This unprecedented level of funding shows that the UK is serious about its role as a global leader in science and technology. By supporting bold ideas and giving researchers the tools they need, the government hopes to unlock progress, create opportunity, and deliver real benefits for people and businesses throughout the country.

The UK’s Business and Trade Secretary, Jonathan Reynolds, has set out the government's position following the United States' recent imposition of new tariffs on UK exports. These include a 10% reciprocal tariff on British goods and a separate 25% global tariff on cars — moves that have prompted concern among UK manufacturers and exporters.

Reynolds told Parliament he was disappointed by the decision, particularly given the close trading relationship between the two countries. While the US has already imposed a 25% tariff on steel, aluminium, and related products since March, the latest action extends the economic pressure and signals a hardening stance from Washington.

Despite the setback, the Trade Secretary struck a calm and constructive tone, saying the UK will continue to act in the national interest while standing behind domestic industries. He confirmed that UK officials are in ongoing talks with key figures in the US administration, including the Secretary of Commerce and the US Trade Representative, in an effort to rebuild a more stable and mutually beneficial trading relationship.

Reynolds was clear that the government is not seeking to inflame tensions but is preparing for all eventualities. A new public consultation has been launched, inviting businesses and stakeholders to give their views on the impact of the tariffs and to suggest potential UK responses. The consultation runs until 1 May and aims to ensure that any future action is well-informed and proportionate.

The government has also committed to helping businesses navigate the situation, offering guidance through its trade support services and encouraging firms to share their concerns. Reynolds noted that many UK companies still see strong opportunities in US-UK trade and want to preserve access to the world’s largest economy.

He ended by affirming the government’s wider strategy to promote economic resilience through industrial growth, international cooperation, and fair trading practices. The message from the Department for Business and Trade is that while the tariffs are unwelcome, the UK remains focused on protecting its interests without resorting to knee-jerk reactions.

In short, the UK is taking a pragmatic, level-headed approach — defending its industries, listening to businesses, and working to keep trade channels open, even in challenging circumstances.

Kau Media Group (KMG) Ltd. sought to enforce two post-termination employment restriction (PTRs) contained in a contract of employment to restrict Mr. Hart, a former employee, from working for his proposed new employer, MiSmile Media Ltd. (MML).

Mr. Hart had worked for KMG from November 2020 to late 2024 as an Account Director. From 2021, the defendant became Account Director for MML, a longstanding client of KMG. On the 19th of September 2024, Mr. Hart informed Mr. Khokhar of KMG that he had since taken a job at MML despite being offered more favourable terms, having been approached by the CEO of MML. Mr. Khokhar however made it clear that taking such a job was against the terms of Mr. Hart’s contract.

On the 25th of September 2024, Mr. Hart inaccurately told the claimant he had already signed a contract with MML, before proceedings were started on the 13th of December 2024. The High Court however concluded that KMG did not establish that the PTRs were enforceable with respect to confidentiality and refused the application for injunctive relief on the grounds of ‘restraint of trade’.

The onus was on KMG to demonstrate that the PTRs were reasonable, protected its legitimate business interests, and that any restrictions were commensurate with the benefits secured under the contract. Even though the services provided by MML and KMG were overtly identical, making them potential competitors, the work involved did not comprise a core part of KMG’s dental sector business and thus MML was not effectively in direct competition with KMG. Settled case law has established that legitimate interest does not cover “the skill, experience, know-how, and general knowledge" acquired by an employee, in order to rely on this interest, KMG should have demonstrated ‘objective’ knowledge.

Thus, before incorporating or seeking to enforce any PTRs, ensure that any PTR relied upon is reasonable between the parties, protects the company’s legitimate business interests, and does not venture beyond these demarcations, or else the PTR may be rendered void and unenforceable.