Author: Glenn

Not all VAT-free sales are the same. Understanding the key difference between zero-rated and VAT-exempt supplies could save your business money and prevent costly VAT mistakes.

It's important to understand the distinction between zero-rated and VAT-exempt supplies. While both may appear similar, because no VAT is charged on the sale, the implications for businesses are very different.

If a supply is exempt from VAT, it means no VAT is charged to the customer, and no output VAT is due. However, the downside for businesses is that they cannot reclaim any input VAT (i.e., VAT paid on purchases or expenses related to the exempt activity). This can make exempt activities more expensive to provide, particularly for businesses that incur significant VAT on costs.

Common examples of VAT-exempt supplies include:

• Insurance
• Finance and credit
• Education and training
• Fundraising events run by charities
• Health and welfare services
• Postal services
• Betting and gaming
• Subscriptions to membership organisations
• Selling, leasing, and letting of commercial land and buildings (though this exemption can be waived under certain conditions)

There are exceptions and detailed rules in most of these examples cited above. Whether a supply qualifies as being VAT exempt may depend on how it's structured and who is receiving the service.

The UK government has officially concluded its involvement with NatWest Group, formerly known as the Royal Bank of Scotland (RBS), by selling its remaining shares. This move ends nearly 17 years of public ownership that began during the 2008 financial crisis.

In 2008 and 2009, the government injected £45.5 billion into RBS to stabilise the bank, which at the time was one of the largest in the world, with over 40 million customers and operations in more than 50 countries. This intervention was deemed necessary to protect the UK economy and financial system from collapse, safeguarding millions of savers, businesses, and jobs.

Economic Secretary to the Treasury, Emma Reynolds, highlighted that bringing NatWest fully back into private ownership is a significant milestone for the UK banking sector post-financial crisis. She noted that the current government halted a planned retail share sale, which could have cost taxpayers hundreds of millions, opting instead to sell shares at market value to prioritise taxpayer interests.

To date, £35 billion has been returned to the Exchequer through share sales, dividends, and fees. While this is approximately £10.5 billion less than the original support provided, the Office for Budget Responsibility has indicated that the cost of inaction would have been far greater, potentially devastating people's savings, mortgages, and livelihoods, and undermining confidence in the UK's financial system.

Working capital refers to the day-to-day funds a business uses to manage its operations. It is the difference between current assets (such as cash, stock, and trade debtors) and current liabilities (such as trade creditors and short-term loans). Efficient working capital management is crucial for the smooth running of any business. But where does this money actually come from?

There are two main types of funding for working capital: internal and external.

Internal sources come from within the business. Profits retained after tax can be reinvested to support stock purchases, fund short-term customer credit, or settle supplier bills. Delaying payments to suppliers (without harming relationships) can also ease pressure on cash flow, as can encouraging faster customer payments. Managing stock levels carefully to avoid tying up funds in excess inventory is another way businesses internally finance working capital needs.

However, not all businesses have the luxury of strong retained profits or optimal cash flow. This is where external sources come into play.

Bank overdrafts are a common short-term solution. They offer flexible access to funds, often with interest charged only on the amount used. Overdrafts are useful for bridging short-term cash flow gaps but can become costly if used for extended periods.

Trade credit from suppliers is another widely used form of funding. By offering payment terms of 30 to 90 days, suppliers effectively finance part of a business’s working capital.

Invoice finance, including factoring and invoice discounting, allows businesses to release cash tied up in unpaid invoices. A lender advances a percentage of the invoice value upfront, improving cash flow while awaiting customer payment.

Short-term loans and revolving credit facilities are also available. These may come from banks or alternative lenders and can provide structured funding with fixed repayment schedules.

The right mix of funding depends on the nature of the business, the industry it operates in, and its financial health.

Employers must pay Class 1A NICs for 2024–25 benefits by 19 July (post) or 22 July (electronic). These apply to perks like company cars and private health cover—late payment risks penalties from HMRC.

Class 1A NICs are payable by employers on the value of most taxable benefits offered to employees and directors, including company cars and private medical insurance. They are also due on any portion of termination payments exceeding £30,000, provided that Class 1 NICs have not already been applied.

To ensure the payment is correctly allocated, employers should use their Accounts Office reference number as the payment reference and clearly indicate the relevant tax year and month. It is important to note that Class 1A NICs paid in July always relate to the previous tax year.

There are three key dates employers must remember for the 2024–25 Class 1A NICs. Forms P11D and P11D(b) must be submitted by 6 July 2025. Postal cheque payments must reach HMRC by 19 July 2025, and electronic payments must clear into HMRC’s bank account by 22 July 2025.

These contributions generally apply to benefits provided to company directors, employees, individuals in controlling positions, and their family or household members.

Employees using company fuel for private journeys can sidestep a hefty benefit charge by repaying the full private fuel cost to their employer by 6 July 2025. Miss the deadline, and tax becomes unavoidable.

This repayment process is known as "making good," and requires the employee to repay the employer for private fuel no later than 6 July following the end of the tax year. For the 2024–25 tax year, the repayment must be completed by 6 July 2025.

If the repayment is not made by the deadline, the employee becomes liable for the car fuel benefit charge. This charge is calculated based on the vehicle’s CO2 emissions and the car fuel benefit multiplier. The charge applies regardless of the actual amount of private fuel used, making it potentially costly for employees who only use a small amount of fuel for private journeys, such as commuting.

To avoid the tax, the employee must fully repay the employer for all private fuel used during the year, including fuel used to travel to and from work. Accurate record-keeping is essential, as HMRC will only accept that no benefit has arisen if the full cost is repaid by the deadline. In many cases, repaying the private fuel cost can be more financially beneficial than paying the fuel benefit charge.