Author: Glenn

If you have tenants in your home, it’s essential to understand the Capital Gains Tax (CGT) implications. Typically, there is no CGT on the sale of a property used as your main residence due to Private Residence Relief (PRR). However, if part of your home has been let out, your entitlement to PRR may be affected.

Homeowners who let out part of their property may not qualify for the full PRR, but they could be eligible for letting relief. Letting relief is available to homeowners who live in their property while renting out a portion of it.

The maximum letting relief you can claim is the lesser of the following:

• £40,000
• The amount of PRR due
• The chargeable gain made on the part of the property let out

Example:

• You rent out a large bedroom to a tenant, making up 10% of your home.
• You sell the property and make a gain of £75,000.
• You qualify for PRR on 90% of the property (£67,500).
• The remaining gain of £7,500 relates to the portion of the home that’s been let.

In this case, the maximum letting relief due is £7,500, which is the lower of:

• £40,000
• £67,500 (the PRR due)
• £7,500 (the gain on the part of the property that’s been let)

As a result, you would not owe any CGT—the £75,000 gain is fully covered by £67,500 in PRR and £7,500 in letting relief.

Note that if you have a lodger who shares living space with you or if your children or parents live with you and pay rent or contribute to housekeeping, you are not considered to be letting out part of your home for tax purposes.

From 18 November 2025, all company directors and people with significant control (PSCs) will be legally required to verify their identity at Companies House. This verification is being phased in over 12 months and Companies House is contacting companies directly with guidance regarding what needs to be done and by when.

These changes are intended to help ensure that people setting up, running and controlling companies are who they say they are. An estimated 6 to 7 million people will need to verify their identity by November 2026. The verification process will usually be a one-time requirement. Verification can be undertaken directly with Companies House through GOV.UK One Login or via an Authorised Corporate Service Provider (ACSP).

If you are using GOV.UK One Login you will be asked simple questions to find the best way for you to verify your identity. You must provide answers about yourself, not your company. Depending on your answers, you will then be guided to verify:

• with an app 
• by answering security questions online 
• by entering your details from your photo ID on GOV.UK One Login first, then going to a participating Post Office

To verify your identity at Companies House, you can use the GOV.UK online verification service if you have one of several accepted photo identification documents. These include a biometric passport from any country, a full or provisional UK photo driving licence, a UK biometric residence permit or card or a UK Frontier Worker permit.

If you do not have any of the accepted forms of photo ID but live in the UK, there are alternative ways to verify your identity. This includes verifying your identity in-person at a Post Office or using details from your bank or building society account together with your National Insurance number.

If you are unable to verify your identity using any of the available online or in-person methods, you can appoint an ACSP, such as an accountant or solicitor to verify your identity on your behalf. The ACSP must be registered with Companies House and a UK Anti-Money Laundering (AML) supervisory body. You will need to provide approved documents as evidence of your identity and the agent may charge a fee for their services.

Companies can reduce their Corporation Tax bill through a range of reliefs, including R&D credits, Patent Box, and creative industry tax reliefs, all of which will help to lower the overall tax on profits. Your company can also claim capital allowances for assets such as equipment, machinery and cars bought to use in your business.

The basic Corporation Tax reliefs include the following:

Research and Development tax reliefs – The R&D expenditure credit (RDEC) and enhanced R&D intensive support (ERIS) came into effect for accounting periods beginning on or after 1 April 2024. While the expenditure rules for both are the same, the calculation methods differ. The merged RDEC scheme is a taxable expenditure credit available to eligible trading companies subject to UK Corporation Tax. Even if a company qualifies for the ERIS, it may choose to claim under the merged scheme instead, but both schemes cannot be claimed for the same expenditure.

The Patent Box – This relief allows qualifying companies to apply a lower 10% corporation tax rate on profits arising from patent exploitation.

Creative industry tax reliefs (CITR) – This is the term for a collection of Corporation Tax reliefs that allow qualifying companies to claim a larger deduction, or in some circumstances claim a payable tax credit when calculating their taxable profits. The relief applies to qualifying expenditure in the production of certain films, high-end television, animation, video games, children’s television, theatre, orchestra and museum & galleries exhibitions.

Relief on goodwill and relevant assets – If the relief is available, it is at a fixed rate of 6.5% a year. This is on the lower of the cost of the relevant asset or 6 times the cost of any qualifying IP assets in the business purchased.

Loss relief – There are various Corporation Tax reliefs that may be available where your company or organisation makes a trading terminal, capital or property income losses. For example, trading losses may be used to claim relief from Corporation Tax by offsetting the loss against other gains or profits of the business in the same or previous accounting period.

Ms Constantine had been a veterinary surgeon since 2017. Initially, she had worked every day with two half days rest, but this increased to four full days and a weekend every three weeks. Moreover, she was required to seek permission to be absent on those days she was not required to attend work. In November 2020, Ms Constantine began a sickness absence, claiming burnout, and was certified as being unfit to work from 1 December 2020 to 4 January 2021 due to anxiety. In May 2021, a ‘fit for work’ statement recommended one day a week, which was subsequently increased in June 2021 to one and a half days a week, with at least one day off between workdays. 

Following a meeting on 22 June 2022, the respondent agreed to look into issuing a new contract for a three-and-a-half-day week with two in six weekends. A proposed contract with a covering letter dated 24 August 2022 was sent to the claimant with a £23,267 gross salary per annum, which was not in alignment with the agreed basis that it should be based, pro rata, on her previous full-time salary of £44,000 p.a. The claimant contended that the revised salary calculations were severely flawed and effectively constituted a 22.4% pay cut based on a new notional denominator of 260 working days in the form of a ‘take it or leave it’ offer. 

Further, a series of unauthorised wage deductions had been made from May 2021 to 31 July 2023, and Ms Constantine ultimately resigned in 2023, lodging a formal grievance on 14 March 2023, specifically complaining about the basis of the calculations of her pro-rata pay from May 2021, asserting a breach of the Part-Time Worker (PTW) Regulations 2000 and unlawful deduction from wages.

The Tribunal ruled in favour of Ms Constantine, finding an unlawful deduction from wages, constructive unfair dismissal, and unfavourable treatment arising in consequence of disability, and she was awarded a total of £19,017.  Ms Constantine was deemed to have been a disabled person from December 2021 due to chronic fatigue, as the respondent should have known, and the act of proposing a new part-time contract in August 2022 at a disproportionately low salary constituted unfavourable treatment arising from the claimant’s need to reduce her hours due to disability (s.15 Equality Act 2010).

The claim for constructive unfair dismissal was upheld because the respondent had committed a fundamental breach of contract by withholding admitted back pay and making its payment conditional on the claimant agreeing to the proposed future salary. Finally, the Tribunal found that an unauthorised deduction from wages had occurred, applying the Apportionment Act 1870 to set the lawful deduction rate at 1/365th of the annual salary for days the claimant was rostered to work but was absent.

When seeking to reduce an employee's hours, any resulting contract must be calculated correctly on a pro-rata basis in accordance with the PTWs. Employers must prove that any proposed pay revisions are not only fair, but also "necessary and appropriate" to achieve a legitimate business aim. Above all, employers must never deliberately withhold payment in an effort to coerce an employee into agreeing to new contractual terms. Such an act risks breaching the implied term of mutual trust and confidence, creating grounds for constructive unfair dismissal.

Every successful business, no matter how innovative or fast-growing, ultimately depends on one simple measure: solvency. A solvent business is one that owns more than it owes, with sufficient assets to cover its debts and the means to continue trading. It is not just an accounting concept, but a signal of underlying financial health and resilience.

Solvency shows that a business can meet its obligations, even during difficult trading periods. When liabilities are kept under control and supported by tangible or liquid assets, a company is less vulnerable to cash flow shocks, rising interest rates or late payments from customers. It provides confidence to suppliers, lenders and investors that the firm is being managed prudently and that short-term fluctuations will not lead to crisis.

Maintaining solvency also provides flexibility. A business that operates with positive net assets can reinvest in growth, negotiate better borrowing terms and respond quickly to new opportunities. In contrast, firms that operate on the edge of insolvency often spend much of their time managing creditors, juggling payments or seeking emergency funding, which can distract from long-term strategy.

There are wider benefits too. Solvent companies tend to attract better staff and more loyal customers, as both groups are reassured by signs of stability. Regulators, insurers and trade bodies all view solvency as a key indicator of sound governance and reliability. For owner-managed firms, it can also make a significant difference when planning for succession, exit or sale, as buyers and investors typically value strong balance sheets and minimal debt exposure.

Regular financial reviews, realistic cash flow forecasts and disciplined control of borrowing are all essential to sustaining solvency. While profit is the measure most often discussed, solvency is the foundation that supports it. A business may trade at a loss for a short period and recover, but once it becomes insolvent, the options narrow rapidly. In uncertain economic conditions, staying solvent remains the clearest mark of real business strength.