Skip to main content

Author: Glenn

Business Asset Disposal Relief – the present rates

If you are thinking about selling a business or shares, it is important to understand how Business Asset Disposal Relief works, particularly with rates set to increase from April 2026.

Business Asset Disposal Relief (BADR) provides a valuable tax advantage, offering a reduced rate of Capital Gains Tax (CGT) on the sale of a business, shares in a trading company or an individual’s stake in a trading partnership.

The present rate of BADR is 14% for disposals made during the 2025-26 tax year. Currently, these rates are set to increase in the 2026-27 tax year starting on 6 April 2026 to 18%. As a result, disposals made after April 2026 will face a higher CGT rate.

These planned changes in the BADR rates can have a significant impact on tax planning for business owners and investors. Furthermore, it is worth noting that upcoming measures in the Autumn Budget could further diminish the benefits of these reliefs.

Despite these changes, the lifetime limit for claiming BADR currently remains at £1 million, which means that individuals can use the relief multiple times, provided their total gains from qualifying disposals do not exceed this threshold.

Changes have also been made to Investors’ Relief. As of 30 October 2024, the lifetime limit for Investors' Relief was reduced from £10 million to £1 million, with CGT rates now aligning with those for BADR at 14% and set to rise to 18% in April 2026.

Why ID verification is supposedly good for business

Last week, we covered the new requirement for directors and persons with significant control (PSCs) to verify their identities from 18 November 2025. This process will be rolled out over 12 months, with Companies House reaching out directly to companies, providing guidance on what actions need to be taken and the deadlines for each step.

According to Companies House, ID verification is a significant step forward for UK businesses and offers numerous benefits. Ensuring that company directors and PSCs verify their identities, will help make sure that the people setting up, running and controlling companies are who they say they are.

This is intended to:

  • improve the accuracy and reliability of data on the register;
  • strengthen protections against fraud; and
  • support a more transparent and trusted business environment.

This also enhances the credibility of data held by Companies House, which is important for businesses looking to build trust with investors, consumers and potential business partners. A verified presence on the register can help a business demonstrate they are legitimate and professional, helping them stand out in the competitive business landscape.

The introduction of ID verification will also make it harder for fraudsters or criminals to create anonymous corporate structures for illicit activities. This added layer of security strengthens the business environment by reducing the risks associated with fraud and economic crime.

For businesses, being listed on Companies House with verified details can boost credibility, aiding in securing contracts, attracting investors and accessing finance. It can also enhance opportunities for due diligence, helping companies evaluate potential suppliers and customers more confidently.

When you don’t need to make payments on account

If you file a Self-Assessment return you may need to pay your tax in three instalments, so it is useful to know when payments on account apply and when they can be reduced or removed.

The first two payments on account are due by 31 January during the tax year and by the 31 July after the tax year has ended. Each payment on account is based on 50% of the previous year’s net Income Tax liability. Additionally, the third (or balancing) payment is due on 31 January after the tax year ends.

However, there are certain situations where you do not need to make payments on account such as:

  1. Your last tax bill is under £1,000. If your self-assessment tax bill for the previous year is less than £1,000, you will not be required to make payments on account.
  2. You have already paid the tax through other means. If at least 80% of the tax due has already been collected through other means, such as PAYE, then payments on account are not required. This might apply if you are employed and have sufficient tax deductions taken from your salary.
  3. You have a low or no income in the current tax year. If you expect your income to be much lower in the current year, you can apply to reduce or cancel your payments on account. This can be done through HMRC’s online service or by submitting form SA303.

There is no limit on the number of times you can apply to adjust your payments on account. If your liability for 2024-25 is lower than for 2023-24, you can request HMRC to reduce your payments. The deadline to submit a claim to reduce your payments on account for 2024-25 is 31 January 2026.

If your taxable profits have increased, there is no obligation to inform HMRC, but your final balancing payment will obviously be higher.

Taxable benefits for use of company car

The tax you pay on the use of a company car depends largely on its CO2 emissions, so choosing a lower emission or electric vehicle can make a significant difference to your overall tax cost.

The benefits in kind (BIK) tax on company cars can be quite significant, with taxable rates ranging from 3% to 37% of the car’s list price when new. The rate depends on various factors, primarily the car’s CO2 emissions and fuel type. For instance, a petrol fuelled car emitting 155 g/km of CO2 or more would be taxed at the highest rate of 37% of its original list price. In contrast, an electric car with a range of 130 miles or more could benefit from the lowest rate of just 3%, significantly reducing the taxable benefit.

This creates a strong incentive for those driving company cars to switch to electric vehicles, as they would experience a noticeable reduction in their tax liability. This shift not only benefits the employees but also employers, who will see a decrease in Class 1A National Insurance contributions. These contributions are based on the total value of benefits provided in a tax year, so switching to electric vehicles helps lower overall costs for the employer.

Diesel cars attract an additional 4% supplement if they do not meet the Real Driving Emissions 2 (RDE2) standard. However, the supplement is removed entirely for diesel vehicles that are RDE2 compliant. The maximum BIK rate, including any diesel supplement, remains capped at 37%.

The taxable benefit is typically calculated based on the car’s manufacturer’s list price, which includes VAT, delivery charges, and number plates. The price considered is the list price on the day before the car is first registered. Any additional accessories fitted to the car also increase the taxable value. There are some exceptions. Employees can also reduce the list price by up to £5,000 if they make a capital contribution towards the cost of the vehicle. Special rules apply to classic cars, which have their own method for calculating the list price.

Beware of the risks of engaging employees as sham contractors

Recently, a clear legal precedent confirmed that the nature of an individual's work is determined by the reality of the actual employment relationship rather than by arbitrary titles. Mr. Gooch worked for the British Free Range Egg Producers Association (BFREPA) from 1 November 2011 until 26 April 2024, initially as a Policy Director on a "contracted services basis" for 2.5 days per week. The organisation, originally an unincorporated association, subsequently became an incorporated company in 2023 (BFREPA Ltd.), although the nature of its work was unaltered.

As Mr. Gooch's role evolved, so his compensation increased and, by 2016, he had effectively been promoted to Chief Executive of Services. Throughout his 12.5 years of engagement, he consistently submitted monthly invoices and was paid a retainer due to his self-employed status, without formally establishing a limited company. In February 2023, BFREPA's leadership expressed concern that their arrangement with Mr. Gooch looked remarkably similar to an employment relationship rather than a self-employed contract, even suggesting that the HMRC would likely classify him as an employee. As a consequence, in March 2023, BFREPA gave him 12 months' notice of termination, and he continued working until April 2024, at which point his email access was disabled, and he received a letter confirming that his contract would not be renewed. Mr. Gooch duly lodged claims against both defendants for unfair dismissal, unauthorised deductions from wages, unpaid holiday, wrongful dismissal for failure to pay statutory notice, and breach of contract relating to pension auto-enrolment. 

The Tribunal ruled that the claimant was a de facto employee, working under a contract of employment as defined by Section 230(1) of the Employment Rights Act 1996, Section 2 of the Working Time Regulations 1998, and Section 88(2) of the Pensions Act 2008. The Tribunal further concluded that personal service was a core requirement of the contract, one which contained no general substitution clause, and that the extent of the control was consistent with an employer-employee relationship for a senior employee alongside other strong indicators of a permanent employment relationship. The contracts also contained restrictive clauses that limited his ability to work for other companies in the same sector, a feature more commonly found in employment contracts than in contracts for service. 

This ruling provides a clear and detailed example of how a tribunal will look beyond the contractual terms to assess whether a person is an employee or a self-employed contractor. Employers cannot rely on a "contract for services" or a person's self-employed status to avoid the legal obligations of an employer. Instead, tribunals will scrutinise key factors such as the mutuality of the obligations, the degree of control, and the extent of integration in the business. Employers who treat long-term contractors like employees—providing them with a fixed monthly retainer, dictating their hours, and effectively integrating them into the business—risk having them reclassified as employees, and HR departments should ensure that contracts reflect the true nature of the relationship to avoid repercussions.